From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx205.postini.com [74.125.245.205]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 312B96B006E for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:58:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:58:06 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 08/26] memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY Message-ID: <20121029205806.GB21640@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1351523301-20048-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <1351524078-20363-7-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <20121029162212.GE20757@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: Lai Jiangshan , Mel Gorman , LKML , x86 maintainers , Jiang Liu , Rusty Russell , Yinghai Lu , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Yasuaki ISIMATU , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Balbir Singh , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon 29-10-12 13:40:39, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory. > > > N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory. > > > > What is the difference of those two? > > > > Patch 5 in the series Strange, I do not see that one at the mailing list. > introduces it to be equal to N_HIGH_MEMORY, so So this is just a rename? If yes it would be much esier if it was mentioned in the patch description. > accepting this patch would be an implicit ack of the direction taken > there. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org