From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx131.postini.com [74.125.245.131]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57AB86B0070 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:43:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:43:17 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: process hangs on do_exit when oom happens Message-ID: <20121023094317.GC15397@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20121019160425.GA10175@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20121023083556.GB15397@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Qiang Gao Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mm@kvack.org, bsingharora@gmail.com On Tue 23-10-12 17:08:40, Qiang Gao wrote: > this is just an example to show how to reproduce. actually,the first time I saw > this situation was on a machine with 288G RAM with many tasks running and > we limit 30G for each. but finanlly, no one exceeds this limit the the system > oom. Yes but mentioning memory controller then might be misleading... It seems that the only factor in your load is the cpu controller. And please stop top-posting. It makes the discussion messy. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org