linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: mk.fraggod@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix secpath kmemleak
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:17:58 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022.151758.1535731378259139241.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350932620.8609.1142.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:03:40 +0200

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> Mike Kazantsev found 3.5 kernels and beyond were leaking memory,
> and tracked the faulty commit to a1c7fff7e18f59e (net:
> netdev_alloc_skb() use build_skb()
> 
> While this commit seems fine, it uncovered a bug introduced
> in commit bad43ca8325 (net: introduce skb_try_coalesce()), in function
> kfree_skb_partial() :
> 
> If head is stolen, we free the sk_buff,
> without removing references on secpath (skb->sp).
> 
> So IPsec + IP defrag/reassembly (using skb coalescing), or
> TCP coalescing could leak secpath objects.
> 
> Fix this bug by calling skb_release_head_state(skb) to properly
> release all possible references to linked objects.
> 
> Reported-by: Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Bisected-by: Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod@gmail.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!

> It seems TCP stack could immediately release secpath references instead
> of waiting skb are eaten by consumer, thats will be a followup patch.

Indeed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2012-10-22 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-19 14:50 PROBLEM: Memory leak (at least with SLUB) from "secpath_dup" (xfrm) in 3.5+ kernels Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-19 17:36 ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-20 12:42   ` Paul Moore
2012-10-20 14:49     ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-20 22:45       ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-21  0:24         ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-21 13:29           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-21 13:57             ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-21 18:43               ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-21 19:51                 ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-21 21:47                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-21 22:58                     ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-22  8:15                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 12:06                         ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-22 15:16                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 15:22                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 15:28                               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 16:59                                 ` Mike Kazantsev
2012-10-22 17:24                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 19:03                                     ` [PATCH] net: fix secpath kmemleak Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 19:17                                       ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121022.151758.1535731378259139241.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mk.fraggod@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox