From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx117.postini.com [74.125.245.117]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A54526B002B for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa10so6686533pad.14 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:12:28 +0900 From: Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Correct the nr_strict_isolated check for CMA Message-ID: <20121016131228.GB5603@barrios> References: <20121016083927.GG29125@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121016083927.GG29125@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , Richard Davies , Shaohua Li , Rik van Riel , Avi Kivity , Arnd Bergmann , QEMU-devel , KVM , Linux-MM , LKML , Arm Kernel Mailing List On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:39:27AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block() > had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction: > Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1". > It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check > still fails and I missed that this fix was not picked up before RC1. This > same problem has been identified in 3.7-RC1 by Tony Prisk and should be > addressed by the following patch. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > Tested-by: Tony Prisk Acked-by: Minchan Kim -- Kind Regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org