From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
To: "m.szyprowski@samsung.com" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kyungmin.park@samsung.com" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"chunsang.jeong@linaro.org" <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>,
Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
"konrad.wilk@oracle.com" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"subashrp@gmail.com" <subashrp@gmail.com>,
"minchan@kernel.org" <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/2] ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma region
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:15:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120821.151521.702882672715065253.hdoyu@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120821142235.97984abc9ad98d01015a3338@nvidia.com>
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> wrote @ Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:22:35 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:28:19 +0200
> Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch changes dma-mapping subsystem to use generic vmalloc areas
> > for all consistent dma allocations. This increases the total size limit
> > of the consistent allocations and removes platform hacks and a lot of
> > duplicated code.
> >
> > Atomic allocations are served from special pool preallocated on boot,
> > because vmalloc areas cannot be reliably created in atomic context.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 486 ++++++++++++-----------------------
> > arch/arm/mm/mm.h | 3 +
> > include/linux/vmalloc.h | 1 +
> > mm/vmalloc.c | 10 +-
> > 6 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-)
> >
> ...
> > @@ -1117,61 +984,32 @@ static int __iommu_free_buffer(struct device *dev, struct page **pages, size_t s
> > * Create a CPU mapping for a specified pages
> > */
> > static void *
> > -__iommu_alloc_remap(struct page **pages, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot)
> > +__iommu_alloc_remap(struct page **pages, size_t size, gfp_t gfp, pgprot_t prot,
> > + const void *caller)
> > {
> > - struct arm_vmregion *c;
> > - size_t align;
> > - size_t count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > - int bit;
> > + unsigned int i, nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + struct vm_struct *area;
> > + unsigned long p;
> >
> > - if (!consistent_pte[0]) {
> > - pr_err("%s: not initialised\n", __func__);
> > - dump_stack();
> > + area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT | VM_USERMAP,
> > + caller);
> > + if (!area)
>
> This patch replaced the custom "consistent_pte" with
> get_vm_area_caller()", which breaks the compatibility with the
> existing driver. This causes the following kernel oops(*1). That
> driver has called dma_pool_alloc() to allocate memory from the
> interrupt context, and it hits BUG_ON(in_interrpt()) in
> "get_vm_area_caller()"(*2). Regardless of the badness of allocation
> from interrupt handler in the driver, I have the following question.
>
> The following "__get_vm_area_node()" can take gfp_mask, it means that
> this function is expected to be called from atomic context, but why
> it's _NOT_ allowed _ONLY_ from interrupt context?
>
> According to the following definitions, "in_interrupt()" is in "in_atomic()".
>
> #define in_interrupt() (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK | NMI_MASK))
> #define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
>
> Does anyone know why BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) is set in __get_vm_area_node(*3)?
For arm_dma_alloc(), it allocates from the pool if GFP_ATOMIC, but for
arm_iommu_alloc_attrs() doesn't have pre-allocate pool at all, and it
always call "get_vm_area_caller()". That's why it hits BUG(). But
still I don't understand why it's not BUG_ON(in_atomic) as Russell
already pointed out(*1).
*1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/76708
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-30 8:28 [PATCHv6 0/2] ARM: replace custom consistent dma region with vmalloc Marek Szyprowski
2012-07-30 8:28 ` [PATCHv6 1/2] mm: vmalloc: use const void * for caller argument Marek Szyprowski
2012-07-30 8:28 ` [PATCHv6 2/2] ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma region Marek Szyprowski
2012-08-21 11:22 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-21 12:15 ` Hiroshi Doyu [this message]
2012-08-21 15:01 ` Marek Szyprowski
2012-08-22 10:09 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-21 12:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-21 12:59 ` Hiroshi Doyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120821.151521.702882672715065253.hdoyu@nvidia.com \
--to=hdoyu@nvidia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chunsang.jeong@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=subashrp@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox