From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx167.postini.com [74.125.245.167]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9944C6B0044 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:29:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pbbjt11 with SMTP id jt11so2752667pbb.14 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:29:48 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] promote zcache from staging Message-ID: <20120806162948.GA27634@kroah.com> References: <5016DE4E.5050300@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120731155843.GP4789@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120731161916.GA4941@kroah.com> <20120731175142.GE29533@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120806003816.GA11375@bbox> <041cb4ce-48ae-4600-9f11-d722bc03b9cc@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: Pekka Enberg , Minchan Kim , Konrad Wilk , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Seth Jennings , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrew Morton , Robert Jennings , Nitin Gupta On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:21:22AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > I suppose: > > (E) replace "demo" zcache with new code base and keep it > in staging for another cycle > > is another alternative, but I think gregkh has said no to that. No I have not. If you all feel that the existing code needs to be dropped and replaced with a totally new version, that's fine with me. It's forward progress, which is all that I ask for. Hope this helps, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org