linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rientjes@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/sparse: fix possible memory leak
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:46:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120702154628.GE8050@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120702134053.GA23800@shangw>

On Mon 02-07-12 21:40:53, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:43:31AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Mon 02-07-12 17:28:56, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> sparse_index_init() is designed to be safe if two copies of it race.  It
> >> uses "index_init_lock" to ensure that, even in the case of a race, only
> >> one CPU will manage to do:
> >> 
> >> 	mem_section[root] = section;
> >> 
> >> However, in the case where two copies of sparse_index_init() _do_ race,
> >> the one that loses the race will leak the "section" that
> >> sparse_index_alloc() allocated for it.  This patch fixes that leak.
> >
> >I would still like to hear how we can possibly race in this code path.
> >I've thought that memory onlining is done from a single CPU.
> >
> 
> Hi Michael, how about to use the following changelog? :-)
> 
> -----
> 
> sparse_index_init() is designed to be safe if two copies of it race.  It
> uses "index_init_lock" to ensure that, even in the case of a race, only
> one CPU will manage to do:
> 
> mem_section[root] = section;
> 
> However, in the case where two copies of sparse_index_init() _do_ race,
> which is probablly caused by making online for multiple memory sections
> that depend on same entry of array mem_section[] simultaneously from
> different CPUs. 

And you really think that this clarified the things? You have just
tweaked the comment to sound more obscure.

OK, so you have pushed me into the code...
If you had looked into the hotplug callchain up to add_memory you would
have seen that the whole arch_add_memory -> __add_pages -> ... ->
sparse_index_init is called with lock_memory_hotplug held so the hotplug
cannot run from the multiple CPUs.

I do not see any other users apart from  boot time
sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions and add_memory so I think that
the lock is just a heritage from old days.

So please make sure you are fixing a real issue rather than add another
code which simply never gets executed.

And no obscuring the changelog doesn't help anybody.

> The one that loses the race will leak the "section" that
> sparse_index_alloc() allocated for it. This patch fixes that leak.

> 
> -----
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
> 
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  mm/sparse.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> >> index 781fa04..a6984d9 100644
> >> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> >> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> >> @@ -75,6 +75,20 @@ static struct mem_section noinline __init_refok *sparse_index_alloc(int nid)
> >>  	return section;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static inline void __meminit sparse_index_free(struct mem_section *section)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned long size = SECTIONS_PER_ROOT *
> >> +			     sizeof(struct mem_section);
> >> +
> >> +	if (!section)
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	if (slab_is_available())
> >> +		kfree(section);
> >> +	else
> >> +		free_bootmem(virt_to_phys(section), size);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static int __meminit sparse_index_init(unsigned long section_nr, int nid)
> >>  {
> >>  	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(index_init_lock);
> >> @@ -102,6 +116,9 @@ static int __meminit sparse_index_init(unsigned long section_nr, int nid)
> >>  	mem_section[root] = section;
> >>  out:
> >>  	spin_unlock(&index_init_lock);
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		sparse_index_free(section);
> >> +
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >>  #else /* !SPARSEMEM_EXTREME */
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >> 
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> >> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> >> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> >> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >
> >-- 
> >Michal Hocko
> >SUSE Labs
> >SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
> >Lihovarska 1060/12
> >190 00 Praha 9    
> >Czech Republic
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> >the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> >see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> >Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-02 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-02  9:28 [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/sparse: optimize sparse_index_alloc Gavin Shan
2012-07-02  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/sparse: fix possible memory leak Gavin Shan
2012-07-02  9:43   ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-02 13:40     ` Gavin Shan
2012-07-02 15:46       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-07-03  3:38         ` Gavin Shan
2012-07-03 12:51           ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-02 11:04   ` David Rientjes
2012-07-02 13:28     ` Gavin Shan
2012-07-02 21:19       ` David Rientjes
2012-07-03  1:19         ` Gavin Shan
2012-07-02  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/sparse: more check on mem_section number Gavin Shan
2012-07-02 11:05   ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120702154628.GE8050@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox