From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx207.postini.com [74.125.245.207]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12E986B0101 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:14:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:14:52 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/25] memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page. Message-ID: <20120621211452.GB31759@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <1340015298-14133-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1340015298-14133-7-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120620132804.GF5541@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <4FE2264F.4070805@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FE2264F.4070805@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , Cristoph Lameter , David Rientjes , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Suleiman Souhlal On Wed 20-06-12 23:36:47, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 06/20/2012 05:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >On Mon 18-06-12 14:27:59, Glauber Costa wrote: > >>From: Suleiman Souhlal > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal > >>Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > >>Acked-by: Kamezawa Hiroyuki > > > >I am not sure the patch is good to merge on its own without the rest. > >One comment bellow. > > > >>--- > >> mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > >>index ce15be4..00b9f1e 100644 > >>--- a/mm/memcontrol.c > >>+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > >>@@ -1998,19 +1998,19 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memcg_stock_pcp, memcg_stock); > >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex); > >> > >> /* > >>- * Try to consume stocked charge on this cpu. If success, one page is consumed > >>- * from local stock and true is returned. If the stock is 0 or charges from a > >>- * cgroup which is not current target, returns false. This stock will be > >>- * refilled. > >>+ * Try to consume stocked charge on this cpu. If success, nr_pages pages are > >>+ * consumed from local stock and true is returned. If the stock is 0 or > >>+ * charges from a cgroup which is not current target, returns false. > >>+ * This stock will be refilled. > >> */ > >>-static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > >>+static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nr_pages) > >> { > >> struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock; > >> bool ret = true; > > > >I guess you want: > > if (nr_pages > CHARGE_BATCH) > > return false; > > > >because you don't want to try to use stock for THP pages. > > > The code reads: > > + if (memcg == stock->cached && stock->nr_pages >= nr_pages) > + stock->nr_pages -= nr_pages; > > Isn't stock->nr_pages always <= CHARGE_BATCH by definition? Yes it is, but why to disable preemption if we know this has no chance to succeed at all? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org