From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx189.postini.com [74.125.245.189]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59EB26B0044 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:44:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so2907231pbb.14 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:44:18 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void * Message-ID: <20120510164418.GC13964@kroah.com> References: <4FA28907.9020300@vflare.org> <4FA2A2F0.3030509@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4FA33DF6.8060107@kernel.org> <20120509201918.GA7288@kroah.com> <4FAB21E7.7020703@kernel.org> <20120510140215.GC26152@phenom.dumpdata.com> <4FABD503.4030808@vflare.org> <4FABDA9F.1000105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120510151941.GA18302@kroah.com> <4FABECF5.8040602@vflare.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FABECF5.8040602@vflare.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Nitin Gupta Cc: Seth Jennings , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Minchan Kim , Dan Magenheimer , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:29:41PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 5/10/12 11:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:11:27AM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote: > >>On 05/10/2012 09:47 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote: > >> > >>>On 5/10/12 10:02 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >>>>struct zs { > >>>> void *ptr; > >>>>}; > >>>> > >>>>And pass that structure around? > >>>> > >>> > >>>A minor problem is that we store this handle value in a radix tree node. > >>>If we wrap it as a struct, then we will not be able to store it directly > >>>in the node -- the node will have to point to a 'struct zs'. This will > >>>unnecessarily waste sizeof(void *) for every object stored. > >> > >> > >>I don't think so. You can use the fact that for a struct zs var,&var > >>and&var->ptr are the same. > >> > >>For the structure above: > >> > >>void * zs_to_void(struct zs *p) { return p->ptr; } > >>struct zs * void_to_zs(void *p) { return (struct zs *)p; } > > > >Do like what the rest of the kernel does and pass around *ptr and use > >container_of to get 'struct zs'. Yes, they resolve to the same pointer > >right now, but you shouldn't "expect" to to be the same. > > > > > > I think we can just use unsigned long as zs handle type since all we > have to do is tell the user that the returned value is not a > pointer. This will be less pretty than a typedef but still better > than a single entry struct + container_of stuff. But then you are casting the thing all around just as much as you were with the void *, right? Making this a "real" structure ensures type safety and lets the compiler find the problems you accidentally create at times :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org