linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: mm: Reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:50:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120326155027.GF16573@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332759384.16159.92.camel@twins>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:56:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:08 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > +               } while (!put_mems_allowed(cpuset_mems_cookie) && !page);
> 
> Sorry for only noticing this now, but wouldn't it be better to first
> check page and only then bother with the put_mems_allowed() thing? That
> avoids the smp_rmb() and seqcount conditional all together in the likely
> case the allocation actually succeeded.
> 
> <SNIP>
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index c3811bc..3b41553 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ struct page *__page_cache_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
>  			cpuset_mems_cookie = get_mems_allowed();
>  			n = cpuset_mem_spread_node();
>  			page = alloc_pages_exact_node(n, gfp, 0);
> -		} while (!put_mems_allowed(cpuset_mems_cookie) && !page);
> +		} while (!page && !put_mems_allowed(cpuset_mems_cookie));
>  
>  		return page;
>  	}

I think such a change would be better but should also rename the API.
If developers see a get_foo type call, they will expect to see a put_foo
call or assume it's a bug even though the implementation happens to be ok
with that. Any suggestion on what a good new name would be?

How about read_mems_allowed_begin() and read_mems_allowed_retry()?

read_mems_allowed_begin would be a rename of get_mems_allowed().  In an
error path, read_mems_allowed_retry() would documented to be *optionally*
called when deciding whether to retry the operation or not. In this scheme,
!put_mems_allowed would become read_mems_allowed_retry() which might be
a bit easier to read overall.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-26 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-07 18:08 Mel Gorman
2012-03-26 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 11:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 15:50   ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-03-26 16:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-27 12:47       ` Mel Gorman
2012-03-27 13:14         ` [PATCH] mm: Optimize put_mems_allowed() usage Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 10:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 20:16           ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-17 20:23             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-23 13:03 ` [PATCH] cpuset: mm: Reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3 Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-23 18:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-26  5:32     ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-29  9:28     ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-29  9:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-29  9:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-29 10:56         ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-29 11:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-29 12:10             ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120326155027.GF16573@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox