From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] mm/memcg: scanning_global_lru means mem_cgroup_disabled
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:31:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120326153131.GA22715@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120326151815.GA1820@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon 26-03-12 17:18:15, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:04:29PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [Adding Johannes to CC]
> >
> > On Fri 23-03-12 01:56:16, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > >
> > > Although one has to admire the skill with which it has been concealed,
> > > scanning_global_lru(mz) is actually just an interesting way to test
> > > mem_cgroup_disabled(). Too many developer hours have been wasted on
> > > confusing it with global_reclaim(): just use mem_cgroup_disabled().
> >
> > Is this really correct?
>
> Yes, if the memory controller is enabled, we never have a global LRU
> and always scan the per-memcg lists.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
> > > Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > Acked-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> > > ---
> > > mm/vmscan.c | 18 ++++--------------
> > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > index 49f15ef..c684f44 100644
> > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > [...]
> > > @@ -1806,7 +1796,7 @@ static int inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz)
> > > if (!total_swap_pages)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - if (!scanning_global_lru(mz))
> > > + if (!mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > > return mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(mz->mem_cgroup,
> > > mz->zone);
> >
> > mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low calculation is slightly different than
> > what we have for cgroup_disabled case. calculate_zone_inactive_ratio
> > considers _all_ present pages in the zone while memcg variant only
> > active+inactive.
>
> The memcg has nothing to go by but actual number of LRU pages; there
> is no 'present pages' equivalent.
Yes
> I don't think that it matters much in reality given the sqrt scale,
> but the difference is still unfortunate.
OK you are probably right that the scale is too small to be a problem.
I guess that a note about changed ratio calculation should be added to
the changelog.
> Konstantin was meaning to unify all this, though.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 21:56 [PATCH v6 0/7] mm: some simple cleanups Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] mm/memcg: scanning_global_lru means mem_cgroup_disabled Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-26 15:04 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-26 15:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-03-26 15:31 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-03-26 21:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-27 7:46 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] mm/memcg: move reclaim_stat into lruvec Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-26 15:16 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] mm: push lru index into shrink_[in]active_list() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-23 4:48 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-26 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] mm: mark mm-inline functions as __always_inline Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] mm: remove lru type checks from __isolate_lru_page() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-23 1:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] mm/memcg: kill mem_cgroup_lru_del() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-23 1:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-26 15:23 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-26 16:05 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-22 21:56 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] mm/memcg: use vm_swappiness from target memory cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-26 15:59 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120326153131.GA22715@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox