From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] memcg: clean up existing move charge code
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:45:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313144501.d031f25d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331591456-20769-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:30:54 -0400
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> We'll introduce the thp variant of move charge code in later patches,
> but before doing that let's start with refactoring existing code.
> Here we replace lengthy function name is_target_pte_for_mc() with
> shorter one in order to avoid ugly line breaks.
> And for better readability, we explicitly use MC_TARGET_* instead of
> simply using integers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Thanks.
Seems ok to me.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.futjisu.com>
Hmm. some nitpicks.
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git linux-next-20120307.orig/mm/memcontrol.c linux-next-20120307/mm/memcontrol.c
> index a288855..3d16618 100644
> --- linux-next-20120307.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ linux-next-20120307/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5069,7 +5069,7 @@ one_by_one:
> }
>
> /**
> - * is_target_pte_for_mc - check a pte whether it is valid for move charge
> + * get_mctgt_type - get target type of moving charge
> * @vma: the vma the pte to be checked belongs
> * @addr: the address corresponding to the pte to be checked
> * @ptent: the pte to be checked
> @@ -5092,7 +5092,7 @@ union mc_target {
> };
>
> enum mc_target_type {
> - MC_TARGET_NONE, /* not used */
> + MC_TARGET_NONE,
How about
MC_TARGET_NONE = 0,
Becasue you use
if (get_mctgt_type())
later.
> MC_TARGET_PAGE,
> MC_TARGET_SWAP,
> };
> @@ -5173,12 +5173,12 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_file_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return page;
> }
>
> -static int is_target_pte_for_mc(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +static enum mc_target_type get_mctgt_type(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t ptent, union mc_target *target)
I admit old name is too long. But...Hm...get_mctgt_type()...how about
move_charge_type() or
mctgt_type() or
mc_type() ?
I don't have good sense of naming ;(
> {
> struct page *page = NULL;
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> - int ret = 0;
> + enum mc_target_type ret = MC_TARGET_NONE;
> swp_entry_t ent = { .val = 0 };
>
> if (pte_present(ptent))
> @@ -5189,7 +5189,7 @@ static int is_target_pte_for_mc(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> page = mc_handle_file_pte(vma, addr, ptent, &ent);
>
> if (!page && !ent.val)
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> if (page) {
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> /*
> @@ -5206,7 +5206,7 @@ static int is_target_pte_for_mc(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> put_page(page);
> }
> /* There is a swap entry and a page doesn't exist or isn't charged */
> - if (ent.val && !ret &&
> + if (ent.val && ret != MC_TARGET_NONE &&
If you do MC_TARGET_NONE = 0 in above, using !ret seems ok to me.
> css_id(&mc.from->css) == lookup_swap_cgroup_id(ent)) {
> ret = MC_TARGET_SWAP;
> if (target)
> @@ -5227,7 +5227,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_count_precharge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE)
> - if (is_target_pte_for_mc(vma, addr, *pte, NULL))
> + if (get_mctgt_type(vma, addr, *pte, NULL))
> mc.precharge++; /* increment precharge temporarily */
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
> cond_resched();
> @@ -5397,8 +5397,8 @@ retry:
> if (!mc.precharge)
> break;
>
> - type = is_target_pte_for_mc(vma, addr, ptent, &target);
> - switch (type) {
> + target_type = get_mctgt_type(vma, addr, ptent, &target);
> + switch (target_type) {
It 'target_type' is unused later
switch(get_mctgt_type(vma, addr, ptent, &target))
is ok ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> case MC_TARGET_PAGE:
> page = target.page;
> if (isolate_lru_page(page))
> @@ -5411,7 +5411,7 @@ retry:
> mc.moved_charge++;
> }
> putback_lru_page(page);
> -put: /* is_target_pte_for_mc() gets the page */
> +put: /* get_mctgt_type() gets the page */
> put_page(page);
> break;
> case MC_TARGET_SWAP:
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-12 22:30 Naoya Horiguchi
2012-03-12 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] thp: add HPAGE_PMD_* definitions for !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE Naoya Horiguchi
2012-03-21 22:07 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-21 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-21 22:36 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-21 23:26 ` David Daney
2012-03-21 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-21 22:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-03-12 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] memcg: avoid THP split in task migration Naoya Horiguchi
2012-03-13 5:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-13 5:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-03-13 22:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] memcg: clean up existing move charge code Naoya Horiguchi
2012-03-14 12:31 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313144501.d031f25d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox