From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@suse.de, dhillf@gmail.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2 0/9] memcg: add HugeTLB resource tracking
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:48:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120302144828.e985c63a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330593380-1361-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:46:11 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset implements a memory controller extension to control
> HugeTLB allocations. It is similar to the existing hugetlb quota
> support in that, the limit is enforced at mmap(2) time and not at
> fault time. HugeTLB's quota mechanism limits the number of huge pages
> that can allocated per superblock.
>
Thank you, I think memcg-extension is better than hugetlbfs cgroup.
> For shared mappings we track the regions mapped by a task along with the
> memcg. We keep the memory controller charged even after the task
> that did mmap(2) exits. Uncharge happens during truncate. For Private
> mappings we charge and uncharge from the current task cgroup.
>
What "current" means here ? current task's cgroup ?
> A sample strace output for an application doing malloc with hugectl is given
> below. libhugetlbfs will fall back to normal pagesize if the HugeTLB mmap fails.
>
> open("/mnt/libhugetlbfs.tmp.uhLMgy", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL, 0600) = 3
> unlink("/mnt/libhugetlbfs.tmp.uhLMgy") = 0
>
> .........
>
> mmap(0x20000000000, 50331648, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
> write(2, "libhugetlbfs", 12libhugetlbfs) = 12
> write(2, ": WARNING: New heap segment map" ....
> mmap(NULL, 42008576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xfff946c0000
> ....
>
>
> Goals:
>
> 1) We want to keep the semantic closer to hugelb quota support. ie, we want
> to extend quota semantics to a group of tasks. Currently hugetlb quota
> mechanism allows one to control number of hugetlb pages allocated per
> hugetlbfs superblock.
>
> 2) Applications using hugetlbfs always fallback to normal page size allocation when they
> fail to allocate huge pages. libhugetlbfs internally handles this for malloc(3). We
> want to retain this behaviour when we enforce the controller limit. ie, when huge page
> allocation fails due to controller limit, applications should fallback to
> allocation using normal page size. The above implies that we need to enforce
> limit at mmap(2).
>
Hm, ok.
> 3) HugeTLBfs doesn't support page reclaim. It also doesn't support write(2). Applications
> use hugetlbfs via mmap(2) interface. Important point to note here is hugetlbfs
> extends file size in mmap.
>
> With shared mappings, the file size gets extended in mmap and file will remain in hugetlbfs
> consuming huge pages until it is truncated. We want to make sure we keep the controller
> charged until the file is truncated. This implies, that the controller will be charged
> even after the task that did mmap exit.
>
O.K. hugetlbfs is charged until the file is removed.
Then, next question will be 'can we destory cgroup....'
> Implementation details:
>
> In order to achieve the above goals we need to track the cgroup information
> along with mmap range in a charge list in inode for shared mapping and in
> vm_area_struct for private mapping. We won't be using page to track cgroup
> information because with the above goals we are not really tracking the pages used.
>
> Since we track cgroup in charge list, if we want to remove the cgroup, we need to update
> the charge list to point to the parent cgroup. Currently we take the easy route
> and prevent a cgroup removal if it's non reclaim resource usage is non zero.
>
As Andrew pointed out, there are some ongoing works about page-range tracking.
Please check.
Thanks,
-Kame
> Changes from V1:
> * Changed the implementation as a memcg extension. We still use
> the same logic to track the cgroup and range.
>
> Changes from RFC post:
> * Added support for HugeTLB cgroup hierarchy
> * Added support for task migration
> * Added documentation patch
> * Other bug fixes
>
> -aneesh
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-02 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 9:16 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 1/9] mm: move hugetlbfs region tracking function to common code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-04 17:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 2/9] mm: Update region function to take new data arg Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 3/9] hugetlbfs: Use the generic region API and drop local one Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 4/9] memcg: Add non reclaim resource tracking to memcg Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-02 8:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-04 18:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-08 5:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-08 11:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 5/9] hugetlbfs: Add memory controller support for shared mapping Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 6/9] hugetlbfs: Add memory controller support for private mapping Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-05-17 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 7/9] memcg: track resource index in cftype private Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 8/9] hugetlbfs: Add memcg control files for hugetlbfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 9:16 ` [PATCH -V2 9/9] memcg: Add memory controller documentation for hugetlb management Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-01 22:40 ` [PATCH -V2 0/9] memcg: add HugeTLB resource tracking Andrew Morton
2012-03-02 3:28 ` David Gibson
2012-03-04 18:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-06 2:38 ` David Gibson
2012-03-04 19:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-05 13:56 ` Hillf Danton
2012-03-06 14:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-02 5:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-03-04 18:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120302144828.e985c63a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox