From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx193.postini.com [74.125.245.193]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3CE56B00EF for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:41:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:41:18 -0500 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [WIP 11/18] Basic support (faulting) for huge pages for shmfs Message-ID: <20120217144118.GB19606@thunk.org> References: <1329403677-25629-1-git-send-email-mail@smogura.eu> <20120216234233.GE26473@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: =?utf-8?B?UmFkb3PFgmF3?= Smogura Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Yongqiang Yang , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM +0100, RadosA?aw Smogura wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:42:33 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote: > >OK, stupid question... where are patches 1 through 10? I'm guessing > >linux-ext4 wasn't cc'ed on them? > > > > - Ted > Actually, I added those for --cc (checked in command history). I > think problems went from mail server, it first sent 10 first > patches, then no more, after 20 min I resented patches from 11, but > after few hours some "not sent" patches were sent (I putted self to > cc, so I know). Now, I see those at > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/. Ok, so there's no difference between the patches sent yesterday with "WIP" in the subject line, and the ones which didn't? It was just a resend, then, correct? - Ted -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org