Re: [PATCH] Handling of unused variable 'do-numainfo on compilation time

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

Michal, this keeps coming up, please decide between the proposed
solutions ;-)

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:43:47PM +0900, Geunsik Lim wrote:
> Actually, Usage of the variable 'do_numainfo'is not suitable for gcc compiler.
> Declare the variable 'do_numainfo' if the number of NUMA nodes > 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 556859f..4e17ac5 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,10 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
>  	/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
>  	if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
>  						MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
> -		bool do_softlimit, do_numainfo;
> +		bool do_softlimit;
> +#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
> +                bool do_numainfo;
> +#endif
>  
>  		do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
>  						MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
> -- 
> 1.7.8.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>