From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: [Slub cleanup 0/9] Slub: cleanups V1
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:16:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120123201646.924319545@linux.com> (raw)
A series of cleanup patches that resulted from the rework
of the allocation paths to not disable interrupts.
The patches remove the node field from kmem_cache_cpu and generally
clean up code in the critical paths.
Hackbench performance before and after using 3.3-rc1
Before After
100 process 20000 152.3 151.2
100 process 20000 160.6 154.8
100 process 20000 161.2 155.5
10 process 20000 15.9 15.5
10 process 20000 15.7 15.5
10 process 20000 15.8 15.5
1 process 20000 1.8 1.6
1 process 20000 1.6 1.6
1 process 20000 1.7 1.6
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 20:16 Christoph Lameter [this message]
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 1/9] slub: Use freelist instead of "object" in __slab_alloc Christoph Lameter
2012-02-01 21:51 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 2/9] slub: Add frozen check " Christoph Lameter
2012-02-01 21:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 3/9] slub: Acquire_slab() avoid loop Christoph Lameter
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 4/9] slub: Simplify control flow in __slab_alloc() Christoph Lameter
2012-02-01 22:02 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 6/9] slub: Get rid of the node field Christoph Lameter
2012-02-01 22:11 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 7/9] slub: Separate out kmem_cache_cpu processing from deactivate_slab Christoph Lameter
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 8/9] slub: Use page variable instead of c->page Christoph Lameter
2012-01-23 20:16 ` [Slub cleanup 9/9] slub: pass page to node_match() instead of kmem_cache_cpu structure Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20120123201708.312262597@linux.com>
2012-02-01 22:05 ` [Slub cleanup 5/9] slub: new_slab_objects() can also get objects from partial list David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120123201646.924319545@linux.com \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox