From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Sha <handai.szj@gmail.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] mm: memcg: hierarchical soft limit reclaim
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:25:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120118092509.GI24386@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFj3OHWY2Biw54gaGeH5fkxzgOhxn7NAibeYT_Jmga-_ypNSRg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:17:25PM +0800, Sha wrote:
> > > I don't think it solve the root of the problem, example:
> > > root
> > > -> A (hard limit 20G, soft limit 12G, usage 20G)
> > > -> A1 ( soft limit 2G, usage 1G)
> > > -> A2 ( soft limit 10G, usage 19G)
> > > ->B1 (soft limit 5G, usage 4G)
> > > ->B2 (soft limit 5G, usage 15G)
> > >
> > > Now A is hitting its hard limit and start hierarchical reclaim under A.
> > > If we choose B1 to go through mem_cgroup_over_soft_limit, it will
> > > return true because its parent A2 has a large usage and will lead to
> > > priority=0 reclaiming. But in fact it should be B2 to be punished.
>
> > Because A2 is over its soft limit, the whole hierarchy below it should
> > be preferred over A1, so both B1 and B2 should be soft limit reclaimed
> > to be consistent with behaviour at the root level.
>
> Well it is just the behavior that I'm expecting actually. But with my
> humble comprehension, I can't catch the soft-limit-based hierarchical
> reclaiming under the target cgroup (A2) in the current implementation
> or after the patch. Both the current mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim or
> shrink_zone select victim sub-cgroup by mem_cgroup_iter, but it
> doesn't take soft limit into consideration, do I left anything ?
No, currently soft limits are ignored if pressure originates from
below root_mem_cgroup.
But iff soft limits are applied right now, they are applied
hierarchically, see mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim().
In my opinion, the fact that soft limits are ignored when pressure is
triggered sub-root_mem_cgroup is an artifact of the per-zone tree, so
I allowed soft limits to be taken into account below root_mem_cgroup.
But IMO, this is something different from how soft limit reclaim is
applied once triggered: currently, soft limit reclaim applies to a
whole hierarchy, including all children. And this I left unchanged.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-18 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 15:02 [patch 0/2] mm: memcg reclaim integration followups Johannes Weiner
2012-01-10 15:02 ` [patch 1/2] mm: memcg: per-memcg reclaim statistics Johannes Weiner
2012-01-10 23:54 ` Ying Han
2012-01-11 0:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-11 22:33 ` Ying Han
2012-01-12 9:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-10 15:02 ` [patch 2/2] mm: memcg: hierarchical soft limit reclaim Johannes Weiner
2012-01-11 21:42 ` Ying Han
2012-01-12 8:59 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-13 21:31 ` Ying Han
2012-01-13 22:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-17 14:22 ` Sha
2012-01-17 14:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-17 20:25 ` Ying Han
2012-01-17 21:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-17 23:39 ` Ying Han
2012-01-18 7:17 ` Sha
2012-01-18 9:25 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2012-01-18 11:25 ` Sha
2012-01-18 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-01-19 6:38 ` Sha
2012-01-12 1:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-13 12:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-18 5:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-13 12:04 ` Michal Hocko
2012-01-13 15:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-13 16:34 ` Michal Hocko
2012-01-13 21:45 ` Ying Han
2012-01-18 9:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-01-18 20:38 ` Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120118092509.GI24386@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=handai.szj@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox