From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:10:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120112191053.GF11715@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0F2E5A.3070602@gmail.com>
> This seems slightly strange reason to me. Almost useless/deprecated feature
> removement broke ltp testsuite. But endusers never complained. Because they
Don't know about that, but it sounds like a regression that should
have been reverted. Testing is important.
> never use testcases for development.
It's a feature for developers. I originally added it for debugging
this code.
> So, May I clarify your intention? To
> use Documention/feature-removal-schedule.txt solve your worry?
I just want it to stay so that the test suite keeps working.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-12 15:07 Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-12 17:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-12 18:26 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-12 19:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-12 19:10 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2012-01-12 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-12 21:07 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-12 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-12 22:29 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-13 15:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-13 18:39 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-13 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120112191053.GF11715@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox