linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, bsingharora@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: malloc memory for possible node in hotplug
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:24:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111221092426.0c8c1521.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324375503-31487-1-git-send-email-lliubbo@gmail.com>

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:05:03 +0800
Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Current struct mem_cgroup_per_node and struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node are
> malloced for all possible node during system boot.
> 
> This may cause some memory waste, better if move it to memory hotplug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>

Ying Han and google people tries to remove this rb_tree completely now.
So, could you wait for a while ?

And I'm not sure how benefical this is...
Are we safe at freeing the node at OFFLINE without confirming there are no
reference ?

Thanks,
-Kame

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index a3d0420..a7a906b 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *mctz;
>  
> -	for_each_node(node) {
> +	for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
>  		for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
>  			mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, node, zone);
>  			mctz = soft_limit_tree_node_zone(node, zone);
> @@ -4894,18 +4894,9 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
>  	enum lru_list l;
> -	int zone, tmp = node;
> -	/*
> -	 * This routine is called against possible nodes.
> -	 * But it's BUG to call kmalloc() against offline node.
> -	 *
> -	 * TODO: this routine can waste much memory for nodes which will
> -	 *       never be onlined. It's better to use memory hotplug callback
> -	 *       function.
> -	 */
> -	if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> -		tmp = -1;
> -	pn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> +	int zone;
> +
> +	pn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pn), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>  	if (!pn)
>  		return 1;
>  
> @@ -4972,7 +4963,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  	mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
>  	free_css_id(&mem_cgroup_subsys, &memcg->css);
>  
> -	for_each_node(node)
> +	for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
>  		free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(memcg, node);
>  
>  	free_percpu(memcg->stat);
> @@ -5025,17 +5016,70 @@ static void __init enable_swap_cgroup(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> +static int __meminit memcg_mem_hotplug_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
> +			       unsigned long action, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct memory_notify *mn = arg;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> +	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rtpn;
> +	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *rtpz;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int nid = mn->status_change_nid;
> +	int zone;
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case MEM_ONLINE:
> +		if (nid != -1) {
> +			for_each_mem_cgroup(iter){
> +				ret = alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(iter, nid);
> +				if (ret)
> +					goto free_out;
> +			}
> +
> +			rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> +			if (!rtpn)
> +				goto free_out;
> +
> +			soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[nid] = rtpn;
> +
> +			for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> +				rtpz = &rtpn->rb_tree_per_zone[zone];
> +				rtpz->rb_root = RB_ROOT;
> +				spin_lock_init(&rtpz->lock);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	case MEM_OFFLINE:
> +		if (nid != -1) {
> +			rtpn = soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[nid];
> +			if (rtpn) {
> +				kfree(rtpn);
> +				soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[nid] = NULL;
> +			}
> +			goto free_out;
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	return notifier_from_errno(ret);
> +
> +free_out:
> +	for_each_mem_cgroup(iter)
> +		free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(iter, nid);
> +	goto out;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rtpn;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *rtpz;
> -	int tmp, node, zone;
> +	int node, zone;
>  
> -	for_each_node(node) {
> -		tmp = node;
> -		if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> -			tmp = -1;
> -		rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, tmp);
> +	for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
> +		rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>  		if (!rtpn)
>  			goto err_cleanup;
>  
> @@ -5050,7 +5094,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_cleanup:
> -	for_each_node(node) {
> +	for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
>  		if (!soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[node])
>  			break;
>  		kfree(soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[node]);
> @@ -5071,7 +5115,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
>  	if (!memcg)
>  		return ERR_PTR(error);
>  
> -	for_each_node(node)
> +	for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
>  		if (alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(memcg, node))
>  			goto free_out;
>  
> @@ -5119,6 +5163,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
>  	atomic_set(&memcg->refcnt, 1);
>  	memcg->move_charge_at_immigrate = 0;
>  	mutex_init(&memcg->thresholds_lock);
> +	hotplug_memory_notifier(memcg_mem_hotplug_callback, 0);
>  	return &memcg->css;
>  free_out:
>  	__mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-21  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-20 10:05 Bob Liu
2011-12-20 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21  1:00   ` Bob Liu
2011-12-21  0:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111221092426.0c8c1521.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox