From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx148.postini.com [74.125.245.148]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CB0E6B005C for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:05:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7E13EE0C0 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:05:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982AF45DEB5 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:05:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF4445DEAD for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:05:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8EE1DB8044 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:05:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.145]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236BE1DB803C for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:05:47 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:04:20 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls Message-Id: <20111209100420.feaef96a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com> References: <1323120903-2831-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kirill@shutemov.name, avagin@parallels.com, devel@openvz.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200 Glauber Costa wrote: > On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during > > the last iteration. > > > > I should highlight: > > 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions) > > it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it > > deserves > > 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the > > task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements. > > To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent > > pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate > > through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway) > > > > The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes. > > > > Kame, > > Does this one address your previous concerns? > Your highlight seems good. I'll look into details. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org