From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net,
gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kirill@shutemov.name, avagin@parallels.com, devel@openvz.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/10] socket: initial cgroup code.
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:07:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111130100738.553020ba.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322611021-1730-4-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:56:54 -0200
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
> The goal of this work is to move the memory pressure tcp
> controls to a cgroup, instead of just relying on global
> conditions.
>
> To avoid excessive overhead in the network fast paths,
> the code that accounts allocated memory to a cgroup is
> hidden inside a static_branch(). This branch is patched out
> until the first non-root cgroup is created. So when nobody
> is using cgroups, even if it is mounted, no significant performance
> penalty should be seen.
>
> This patch handles the generic part of the code, and has nothing
> tcp-specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov<kirill@shutemov.name>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujtsu.com>
> CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
<snip>
> +extern struct jump_label_key memcg_socket_limit_enabled;
> static inline bool sk_has_memory_pressure(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> return sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure != NULL;
> @@ -873,6 +900,17 @@ static inline bool sk_under_memory_pressure(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> if (!sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure)
> return false;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + if (static_branch(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled)) {
> + struct cg_proto *cg_proto = sk->sk_cgrp;
> +
> + if (!cg_proto)
> + goto nocgroup;
> + return !!*cg_proto->memory_pressure;
> + } else
What is dangling 'else' for ?
> +nocgroup:
> +#endif
> +
> return !!*sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure;
> }
>
> @@ -880,52 +918,176 @@ static inline void sk_leave_memory_pressure(struct sock *sk)
> {
> int *memory_pressure = sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure;
>
> - if (memory_pressure && *memory_pressure)
> + if (!memory_pressure)
> + return;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + if (static_branch(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled)) {
> + struct cg_proto *cg_proto = sk->sk_cgrp;
> +
> + if (!cg_proto)
> + goto nocgroup;
> +
> + for (; cg_proto; cg_proto = cg_proto->parent)
> + if (*cg_proto->memory_pressure)
> + *cg_proto->memory_pressure = 0;
> + }
> +nocgroup:
> +#endif
Hmm..can't we have a good way for avoiding this #ifdef ?
I guess... as NUMA_BUILD macro in page_alloc.c, you can define
if (HAS_KMEM_LIMIT && static_branch(&.....)).
For example,
==
#include <stdio.h>
#define HAS_SPECIAL 0
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (HAS_SPECIAL)
call();
printf("Hey!");
}
==
This can be compiled.
So. I guess...
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
#define do_memcg_kmem_account static_branch(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled)
#else
#define do_memcg_kmem_account 0
#endif
maybe good.(not tested.)
BTW, I don't think 'goto nocgroup' is good.
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 3becb24..12a08bf 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -377,6 +377,40 @@ enum mem_type {
> #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SOFT_BIT 0x2
> #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SOFT (1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SOFT_BIT)
>
> +static inline bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + return (memcg == root_mem_cgroup);
> +}
> +
Why do you need this move of definition ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 23:56 [PATCH v7 00/10] Request for Inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure Glauber Costa
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 0:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 0:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-02 17:46 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 1:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 9:06 ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 1:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 1:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-02 17:57 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 2:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 2:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-11-29 23:56 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] Display current tcp failcnt " Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 2:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-29 23:57 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] Display maximum tcp memory allocation " Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 2:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-29 23:57 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] Disable task moving when using kernel memory accounting Glauber Costa
2011-11-30 2:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-02 18:11 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 2:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 9:18 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-06 0:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-30 2:11 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] Request for Inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-02 18:04 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 2:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 9:09 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 9:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 10:28 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111130100738.553020ba.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avagin@parallels.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox