From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jbottomley@parallels.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
devel@openvz.org, kirill@shutemov.name, gthelen@google.com
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:07:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122110707.377ff8ef.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC6B457.4010502@parallels.com>
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:39:03 -0200
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 07:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > TCP specific stuff in mm/memcontrol.c, at best that's not nice at all.
>
> How crucial is that? Thing is that as far as I am concerned, all the
> memcg people really want the inner layout of struct mem_cgroup to be
> private to memcontrol.c
This is just because memcg is just related to memory management and I don't
want it be wide spreaded, 'struct mem_cgroup' has been changed often.
But I don't like to have TCP code in memcgroup.c.
New idea is welcome.
> This means that at some point, we need to have
> at least a wrapper in memcontrol.c that is able to calculate the offset
> of the tcp structure, and since most functions are actually quite
> simple, that would just make us do more function calls.
>
> Well, an alternative to that would be to use a void pointer in the newly
> added struct cg_proto to an already parsed memcg-related field
> (in this case tcp_memcontrol), that would be passed to the functions
> instead of the whole memcg structure. Do you think this would be
> preferable ?
>
like this ?
struct mem_cgroup_sub_controls {
struct mem_cgroup *mem;
union {
struct tcp_mem_control tcp;
} data;
};
/* for loosely coupled controls for memcg */
struct memcg_sub_controls_function
{
struct memcg_sub_controls (*create)(struct mem_cgroup *);
struct memcg_sub_controls (*destroy)(struct mem_cgroup *);
}
int register_memcg_sub_controls(char *name,
struct memcg_sub_controls_function *abis);
struct mem_cgroup {
.....
.....
/* Root memcg will have no sub_controls! */
struct memcg_sub_controls *sub_controls[NR_MEMCG_SUB_CONTROLS];
}
Maybe some functions should be exported.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-07 15:26 Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] per-cgroup tcp buffers control Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] " Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] " Glauber Costa
2011-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] Disable task moving when using kernel memory accounting Glauber Costa
2011-11-09 18:02 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure Glauber Costa
2011-11-15 18:27 ` [Devel] " James Bottomley
2011-11-17 21:35 ` David Miller
2011-11-18 19:39 ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-18 19:51 ` David Miller
2011-11-22 2:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-11-23 10:25 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111122110707.377ff8ef.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox