linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: detect race if fail to COW
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:16:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111121141625.GB16957@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111121122303.GA13594@tiehlicka.suse.cz>

On Mon 21-11-11 13:23:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 18-11-11 17:11:28, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 18-11-11 23:23:12, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > > On Fri 18-11-11 22:04:37, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > >> In the error path that we fail to allocate new huge page, before try again, we
> > > >> have to check race since page_table_lock is re-acquired.
> > > >
> > > > I do not think we can race here because we are serialized by
> > > > hugetlb_instantiation_mutex AFAIU. Without this lock, however, we could
> > > > fall into avoidcopy and shortcut despite the fact that other thread has
> > > > already did the job.
> > > >
> > > > The mutex usage is not obvious in hugetlb_cow so maybe we want to be
> > > > explicit about it (either a comment or do the recheck).
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Then the following check is unnecessary, no?
> > 
> > Hmm, thinking about it some more, I guess we have to recheck because we
> > can still race with page migration. So we need you patch.
> 
> OK, so looked at it again and we cannot race with page migration because
> the page is locked (by unmap_and_move_*page) migration and we have the
> old page locked here as well (hugetlb_fault).
> 
> Or am I missing something?

And the updated patch:
--- 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-18 14:04 Hillf Danton
2011-11-18 14:16 ` John Kacur
2011-11-18 14:21   ` John Kacur
2011-11-18 14:46     ` Hillf Danton
2011-11-18 15:07 ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-18 15:23   ` Hillf Danton
2011-11-18 16:11     ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-18 19:39       ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-19  3:26         ` Hillf Danton
2011-11-21 12:23       ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-21 14:16         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-11-21 14:46           ` [PATCH] hugetlb: clarify hugetlb_instantiation_mutex usage Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111121141625.GB16957@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox