linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	aarcange@redhat.com, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, mel <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5]thp: correct order in lru list for split huge page
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:19:28 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111027231928.GB29407@barrios-laptop.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319511577.22361.140.camel@sli10-conroe>

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:59:37AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> If a huge page is split, all the subpages should live in lru list adjacently
> because they should be taken as a whole.
> In page split, with current code:
> a. if huge page is in lru list, the order is: page, page+HPAGE_PMD_NR-1,
> page + HPAGE_PMD_NR-2, ..., page + 1(in lru page reclaim order)
> b. otherwise, the order is: page, ..other pages.., page + 1, page + 2, ...(in
> lru page reclaim order). page + 1 ... page + HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1 are in the lru
> reclaim tail.
> 
> In case a, the order is wrong. In case b, page is isolated (to be reclaimed),
> but other tail pages will not soon.
> 
> With below patch:
> in case a, the order is: page, page + 1, ... page + HPAGE_PMD_NR-1(in lru page
> reclaim order).
> in case b, the order is: page + 1, ... page + HPAGE_PMD_NR-1 (in lru page reclaim
> order). The tail pages are in the lru reclaim head.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>

In case of a, it doesn't matter ordering of subpages.
As a huge page, age of sub pages are same.

In case of b, what a page is located in tail and other subpages are located in head
isn't critical problem.

Having said that, it's more consistent and simple patch.
So I like that. Nice catch, Shaohua!

Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-27 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-25  2:59 Shaohua Li
2011-10-27 23:19 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2011-10-28  5:08   ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-28  7:21     ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10  2:39       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10 15:57         ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111027231928.GB29407@barrios-laptop.redhat.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox