From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE056B003B for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:58:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:58:45 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [patch v2] oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring Message-ID: <20111012065845.GD31570@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20111011063336.GA23284@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20111012065026.GA31570@tiehlicka.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111012065026.GA31570@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo On Wed 12-10-11 08:50:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 11-10-11 16:36:28, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > The patch looks good but we still need other 2 patches > > > (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/68578), right? > > > > > > > For the lguest patch, Rusty is the maintainer and has already acked the > > patch, so I think it should be merged through him. I don't see a need for > > the second patch since we'll now detect frozen oom killed tasks on retry > > and don't need to kill them directly when oom killed (it just adds > > additional, unnecessary code). > > OK, my understanding was that we need both patches, but you are right, > the later one should be sufficient. Ahh and I forgot to add: Acked-by: Michal Hocko If it matters. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org