From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@linaro.org>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv16 0/9] Contiguous Memory Allocator
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110111552.04615.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010155642.38df59af.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell's going to hate me, but...
>
> I do know that he had substantial objections to at least earlier
> versions of this, and he is a guy who knows of what he speaks.
>
> So I would want to get a nod from rmk on this work before proceeding.
> If that nod isn't available then let's please identify the issues and
> see what we can do about them.
I'm pretty sure that Russell's concerns were almost entirely about the
ARM specific parts, which were extremely hard to figure out. The
most important technical concern back in July was that the patch
series at the time did not address the problem of conflicting pte
flags when we remap memory as uncached on ARMv6. He had a patch
to address this problem that was supposed to get merged in 3.1
and would have conflicted with the CMA patch set.
Things have changed a lot since then. Russell had to revert his
own patch because he found regressions using it on older machines.
However, the current CMA on ARM patch AFAICT reliably fixes this
problem now and does not cause the same regression on older machines.
The solution used now is the one we agreed on after sitting together
for a few hours with Russell, Marek, Paul McKenney and myself.
If there are still concerns over the ARM specific portion of
the patch series, I'm very confident that we can resolve these
now (I was much less so before that meeting).
What I would really want to hear from you is your opinion on
the architecture independent stuff. Obviously, ARM is the
most important consumer of the patch set, but I think the
code has its merit on other architectures as well and most of
them (maybe not parisc) should be about as simple as the x86
one that Marek posted now with v16.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-11 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-06 13:54 Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: move some functions from memory_hotplug.c to page_isolation.c Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-14 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-18 12:05 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-14 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-16 8:01 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-16 8:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-16 9:39 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-17 12:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-17 18:39 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-18 12:21 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-18 17:26 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-18 17:48 ` Dave Hansen
2011-10-18 18:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-21 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-24 1:00 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-24 4:05 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-24 4:05 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-24 4:05 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-24 4:05 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-11-01 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-01 18:06 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-11-01 18:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: alloc_contig_range() added Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-14 23:35 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-18 12:38 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: MIGRATE_CMA migration type added Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-14 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-18 13:08 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-24 19:32 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-27 9:10 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: MIGRATE_CMA isolation functions added Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] drivers: add Contiguous Memory Allocator Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-14 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-16 10:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-18 13:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-10-24 19:39 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-11-04 10:41 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 14:18 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-15 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] X86: " Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: " Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-14 4:33 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Subash Patel
2011-10-14 9:14 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: Samsung: use CMA for 2 memory banks for s5p-mfc device Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-07 16:27 ` [PATCHv16 0/9] Contiguous Memory Allocator Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-10 6:58 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-10-10 12:02 ` Clark, Rob
2011-10-10 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-11 6:57 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-11 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-10-14 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-15 14:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-10 12:07 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Maxime Coquelin
2011-10-11 7:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-11 7:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2011-10-11 10:50 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-11 11:25 ` Maxime Coquelin
2011-10-11 13:05 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-12 11:08 ` [PATCH] fixup: mm: alloc_contig_range: increase min_free_kbytes during allocation Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-12 13:01 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201110111552.04615.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
--cc=chunsang.jeong@linaro.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jesse.barker@linaro.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=shariq.hasnain@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox