From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC49000BD for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:59:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862783EE0BD for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:59:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5576445DEB8 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:59:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B7E45DEB5 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:59:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2306B1DB803E for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:59:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from m105.s.css.fujitsu.com (m105.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.145]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62251DB8040 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:59:12 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:58:26 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Message-Id: <20110928095826.eb8ebc8c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <4E81084F.9010208@parallels.com> References: <1316393805-3005-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1316393805-3005-2-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20110926193451.b419f630.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <4E81084F.9010208@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kirill@shutemov.name On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:18:39 -0300 Glauber Costa wrote: > On 09/26/2011 07:34 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:56:39 -0300 > > Glauber Costa wrote: "If parent sets use_hierarchy==1, children must have the same kmem_independent value > > with parant's one." > > > > How do you think ? I think a hierarchy must have the same config. > BTW, Kame: > > Look again (I forgot myself when I first replied to you) > Only in the root cgroup those files get registered. > So shouldn't be a problem, because children won't even > be able to see them. > > Do you agree with this ? > agreed. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org