From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com [216.82.243.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27269000BD for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:03:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:03:26 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: [PATCH] lguest: move process freezing before pending signals check Message-ID: <20110927070326.GA24377@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20110826070946.GA7280@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110826085610.GA9083@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110826095356.GB9083@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110926082837.GC10156@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <87sjnjk36l.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20110926110559.GH10156@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <87k48uk9o3.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k48uk9o3.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rusty Russell Cc: David Rientjes , Oleg Nesterov , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KOSAKI Motohiro , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tejun Heo On Tue 27-09-11 11:51:00, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:05:59 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 26-09-11 19:58:50, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:28:37 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Fri 26-08-11 11:13:40, David Rientjes wrote: > > > > > I'd love to be able to do a thaw on a PF_FROZEN task in the oom killer > > > > > followed by a SIGKILL if that task is selected for oom kill without an > > > > > heuristic change. Not sure if that's possible, so we'll wait for Rafael > > > > > to chime in. > > > > > > > > We have discussed that with Rafael and it should be safe to do that. See > > > > the patch bellow. > > > > The only place I am not entirely sure about is run_guest > > > > (drivers/lguest/core.c). It seems that the code is able to cope with > > > > signals but it also calls lguest_arch_run_guest after try_to_freeze. > > > > > > Yes; if you want to kill things in the refrigerator(), then will a > > > > > > if (cpu->lg->dead || task_is_dead(current)) > > > break; > > > > > > Work? > > > > The task is not dead yet. We should rather check for pending signals. > > Can we just move try_to_freeze up before the pending signals check? > > Yep, that works. > > Acked-by: Rusty Russell Thanks. The full patch bellow: ---