linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] oom: give bonus to frozen processes
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:31:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110926183115.277afeb1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109260157270.1389@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > Let's try it with a heuristic change first. If you really do not like
> > it, we can move to oom_scode_adj. I like the heuristic change little bit
> > more because it is at the same place as the root bonus.
> 
> The problem with the bonus is that, as mentioned previously, it doesn't 
> protect against ANYTHING for the case you're trying to fix.  This won't 
> panic the machine because all killable threads are guaranteed to have a 
> non-zero badness score, but it's a very valid configuration to have either
> 
>  - all eligible threads (system-wide, shared cpuset, shared mempolicy 
>    nodes) are frozen, or
> 
>  - all eligible frozen threads use <5% of memory whereas all other 
>    eligible killable threads use 1% of available memory.
> 
> and that means the oom killer will repeatedly select those threads and the 
> livelock still exists unless you can guarantee that they are successfully 
> thawed, that thawing them in all situations is safe, and that once thawed 
> they will make a timely exit.
> 
> Additionally, I don't think biasing against frozen tasks makes sense from 
> a heusritic standpoint of the oom killer.  Why would we want give 
> non-frozen tasks that are actually getting work done a preference over a 
> task that is frozen and doing absolutely nothing?  It seems like that's 
> backwards and that we'd actually prefer killing the task doing nothing so 
> it can free its memory.
> 

I agree with David.
Why don't you set oom_score_adj as -1000 for processes which never should die ?
You don't freeze processes via user-land using cgroup ?

Thanks,
-Kame



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-26  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-23  8:31 [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-23  9:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-23 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-23 20:18 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-24 10:19   ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-24 19:31     ` David Rientjes
2011-08-25  9:19       ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-25 15:18         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 16:47           ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-25 21:14             ` David Rientjes
2011-08-26  7:09               ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26  8:56                 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26  9:21                   ` David Rientjes
2011-08-26  9:53                     ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 11:01                       ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 18:13                       ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26  8:28                         ` [PATCH 1/2] oom: do not live lock on " Michal Hocko
2011-09-26  8:56                           ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26  9:14                             ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-26  9:25                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26  9:32                                 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-26 15:51                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-26 18:28                                 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-27  1:03                                 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-27  7:52                                   ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-27 18:30                                     ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26 10:28                           ` Rusty Russell
2011-09-26 11:05                             ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-27  2:21                               ` Rusty Russell
2011-09-27  7:03                                 ` [PATCH] lguest: move process freezing before pending signals check Michal Hocko
2011-09-26  8:35                         ` [PATCH 2/2] oom: give bonus to frozen processes Michal Hocko
2011-09-26  9:02                           ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26  9:31                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-09-26  9:54                               ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 21:03                     ` [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-26 10:03                   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 10:48                     ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 12:44                       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 12:59                         ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26  7:35               ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26  9:09                 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-26  9:59                   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 18:09                     ` David Rientjes
2011-08-25 21:03           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110926183115.277afeb1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox