From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] oom: give bonus to frozen processes
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:31:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110926183115.277afeb1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109260157270.1389@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > Let's try it with a heuristic change first. If you really do not like
> > it, we can move to oom_scode_adj. I like the heuristic change little bit
> > more because it is at the same place as the root bonus.
>
> The problem with the bonus is that, as mentioned previously, it doesn't
> protect against ANYTHING for the case you're trying to fix. This won't
> panic the machine because all killable threads are guaranteed to have a
> non-zero badness score, but it's a very valid configuration to have either
>
> - all eligible threads (system-wide, shared cpuset, shared mempolicy
> nodes) are frozen, or
>
> - all eligible frozen threads use <5% of memory whereas all other
> eligible killable threads use 1% of available memory.
>
> and that means the oom killer will repeatedly select those threads and the
> livelock still exists unless you can guarantee that they are successfully
> thawed, that thawing them in all situations is safe, and that once thawed
> they will make a timely exit.
>
> Additionally, I don't think biasing against frozen tasks makes sense from
> a heusritic standpoint of the oom killer. Why would we want give
> non-frozen tasks that are actually getting work done a preference over a
> task that is frozen and doing absolutely nothing? It seems like that's
> backwards and that we'd actually prefer killing the task doing nothing so
> it can free its memory.
>
I agree with David.
Why don't you set oom_score_adj as -1000 for processes which never should die ?
You don't freeze processes via user-land using cgroup ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-26 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-23 8:31 [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-23 9:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-23 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-23 20:18 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-24 10:19 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-24 19:31 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-25 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-25 15:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 16:47 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-25 21:14 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-26 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 8:56 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 9:21 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-26 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 18:13 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26 8:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] oom: do not live lock on " Michal Hocko
2011-09-26 8:56 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26 9:14 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-26 9:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 9:32 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-26 15:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-26 18:28 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-27 1:03 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-27 7:52 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-27 18:30 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26 10:28 ` Rusty Russell
2011-09-26 11:05 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-27 2:21 ` Rusty Russell
2011-09-27 7:03 ` [PATCH] lguest: move process freezing before pending signals check Michal Hocko
2011-09-26 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom: give bonus to frozen processes Michal Hocko
2011-09-26 9:02 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-26 9:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-09-26 9:54 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 21:03 ` [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-26 10:03 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 10:48 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 12:44 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 12:59 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-26 7:35 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 9:09 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-26 9:59 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-26 18:09 ` David Rientjes
2011-08-25 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110926183115.277afeb1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox