From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 03/11] mm: vmscan: distinguish between memcg triggering reclaim and memcg being scanned
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:29:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110919142955.GG21847@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315825048-3437-4-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com>
On Mon 12-09-11 12:57:20, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Memory cgroup hierarchies are currently handled completely outside of
> the traditional reclaim code, which is invoked with a single memory
> cgroup as an argument for the whole call stack.
>
> Subsequent patches will switch this code to do hierarchical reclaim,
> so there needs to be a distinction between a) the memory cgroup that
> is triggering reclaim due to hitting its limit and b) the memory
> cgroup that is being scanned as a child of a).
>
> This patch introduces a struct mem_cgroup_zone that contains the
> combination of the memory cgroup and the zone being scanned, which is
> then passed down the stack instead of the zone argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Looks good to me. Some minor comments bellow
Anyways:
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 354f125..92f4e22 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
[...]
> @@ -1853,13 +1865,13 @@ static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
> *
> * nr[0] = anon pages to scan; nr[1] = file pages to scan
> */
> -static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> - unsigned long *nr, int priority)
> +static void get_scan_count(struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz, struct scan_control *sc,
> + unsigned long *nr, int priority)
> {
> unsigned long anon, file, free;
> unsigned long anon_prio, file_prio;
> unsigned long ap, fp;
> - struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> + struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(mz);
> u64 fraction[2], denominator;
> enum lru_list l;
> int noswap = 0;
You can save some patch lines by:
struct zone *zone = mz->zone;
and not doing zone => mz->zone changes that follow.
> @@ -1889,16 +1901,16 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - anon = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON) +
> - zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
> - file = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> - zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
> + anon = zone_nr_lru_pages(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON) +
> + zone_nr_lru_pages(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + file = zone_nr_lru_pages(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> + zone_nr_lru_pages(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
>
> if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
> - free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
> + free = zone_page_state(mz->zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
> /* If we have very few page cache pages,
> force-scan anon pages. */
> - if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(zone))) {
> + if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(mz->zone))) {
> fraction[0] = 1;
> fraction[1] = 0;
> denominator = 1;
[...]
> @@ -2390,6 +2413,18 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void age_active_anon(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> + int priority)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = {
> + .mem_cgroup = NULL,
> + .zone = zone,
> + };
> +
> + if (inactive_anon_is_low(&mz))
> + shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, &mz, sc, priority, 0);
> +}
> +
I do not like this very much because we are using a similar construct in
shrink_mem_cgroup_zone so we are duplicating that code.
What about adding age_mem_cgroup_active_anon (something like shrink_zone).
> /*
> * pgdat_balanced is used when checking if a node is balanced for high-order
> * allocations. Only zones that meet watermarks and are in a zone allowed
> @@ -2510,7 +2545,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> */
> .nr_to_reclaim = ULONG_MAX,
> .order = order,
> - .mem_cgroup = NULL,
> + .target_mem_cgroup = NULL,
> };
> struct shrink_control shrink = {
> .gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
> @@ -2549,9 +2584,7 @@ loop_again:
> * Do some background aging of the anon list, to give
> * pages a chance to be referenced before reclaiming.
> */
> - if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc))
> - shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone,
> - &sc, priority, 0);
> + age_active_anon(zone, &sc, priority);
>
> if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order,
> high_wmark_pages(zone), 0, 0)) {
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-12 10:57 [patch 0/11] mm: memcg naturalization -rc3 Johannes Weiner
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 01/11] mm: memcg: consolidate hierarchy iteration primitives Johannes Weiner
2011-09-12 22:37 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-13 5:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-19 13:06 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-13 10:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-19 12:53 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-20 8:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-20 8:53 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 02/11] mm: vmscan: distinguish global reclaim from global LRU scanning Johannes Weiner
2011-09-12 23:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-13 5:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-19 13:23 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-19 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-20 8:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 03/11] mm: vmscan: distinguish between memcg triggering reclaim and memcg being scanned Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-19 14:29 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-09-20 8:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-20 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-29 7:55 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 04/11] mm: memcg: per-priority per-zone hierarchy scan generations Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-13 11:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-14 0:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-14 5:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-14 7:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-20 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-20 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-20 9:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-20 12:37 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 05/11] mm: move memcg hierarchy reclaim to generic reclaim code Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-20 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-20 13:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-20 14:08 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 06/11] mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-20 15:02 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-29 9:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 9:49 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 07/11] mm: vmscan: convert unevictable page rescue scanner to per-memcg LRU lists Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-21 12:33 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-21 13:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-21 14:08 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 08/11] mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim " Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-21 13:10 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-21 13:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-21 13:57 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 09/11] mm: collect LRU list heads into struct lruvec Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-21 13:43 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-21 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 10/11] mm: make per-memcg LRU lists exclusive Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-21 15:24 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-21 15:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-21 16:05 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-12 10:57 ` [patch 11/11] mm: memcg: remove unused node/section info from pc->flags Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 10:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-21 15:32 ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-13 20:35 ` [patch 0/11] mm: memcg naturalization -rc3 Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110919142955.GG21847@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox