From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] oom: fix race while temporarily setting current's oom_score_adj
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:57:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110830155733.GB22754@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108300041330.21066@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 08/30, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> Using that function to both set oom_score_adj to OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX and
> then reinstate the previous value is racy since it's possible that
> userspace can set the value to something else itself before the old value
> is reinstated. That results in userspace setting current's oom_score_adj
> to a different value and then the kernel immediately setting it back to
> its previous value without notification.
Sure,
> To fix this, a new compare_swap_oom_score_adj() function is introduced
> with the same semantics as the compare and swap CAS instruction, or
> CMPXCHG on x86. It is used to reinstate the previous value of
> oom_score_adj if and only if the present value is the same as the old
> value.
But this can't fix the race completely ?
> +void compare_swap_oom_score_adj(int old_val, int new_val)
> +{
> + struct sighand_struct *sighand = current->sighand;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
> + if (current->signal->oom_score_adj == old_val)
> + current->signal->oom_score_adj = new_val;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
> +}
So. This is used this way:
old_val = test_set_oom_score_adj(OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX);
do_something();
compare_swap_oom_score_adj(OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX, old_val);
What if userspace sets oom_score_adj = OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX in between?
May be the callers should use OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX + 1 instead, this way
we can't confuse old_val with the value from the userspace...
But in fact I am writing this email because I have the question.
Do we really need 2 helpers, and do we really need to allow to set
the arbitrary value?
I mean, perhaps we can do something like
void set_oom_victim(bool on)
{
if (on) {
oom_score_adj += ADJ_MAX - ADJ_MIN + 1;
} else if (oom_score_adj > ADJ_MAX) {
oom_score_adj -= ADJ_MAX - ADJ_MIN + 1;
}
}
Not sure this really makes sense, just curious.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110727163159.GA23785@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110727163610.GJ23793@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110727175624.GA3950@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110728154324.GA22864@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107281341060.16093@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <20110729141431.GA3501@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110730143426.GA6061@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110730152238.GA17424@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4E369372.80105@jp.fujitsu.com>
[not found] ` <20110829183743.GA15216@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108291611070.32495@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
2011-08-30 7:43 ` [patch 1/2] oom: remove oom_disable_count David Rientjes
2011-08-30 7:43 ` [patch 2/2] oom: fix race while temporarily setting current's oom_score_adj David Rientjes
2011-08-30 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-08-30 15:28 ` [patch 1/2] oom: remove oom_disable_count Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-30 22:06 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110830155733.GB22754@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox