From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71B866B016A for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:01:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:03:17 +0200 References: <20110823073101.6426.77745.stgit@zurg> <20110825091920.GA22564@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110825151818.GA4003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110825151818.GA4003@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108252303.17446.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KOSAKI Motohiro , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Thursday, August 25, 2011, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/25, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Wed 24-08-11 12:31:26, David Rientjes wrote: > > > > > > That's obviously false since we call oom_killer_disable() in > > > freeze_processes() to disable the oom killer from ever being called in the > > > first place, so this is something you need to resolve with Rafael before > > > you cause more machines to panic. > > > > I didn't mean suspend/resume path (that is protected by oom_killer_disabled) > > so the patch doesn't make any change. > > Confused... freeze_processes() does try_to_freeze_tasks() before > oom_killer_disable() ? Yes, it does. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org