From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110824002717.GI23870@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110824000914.GH23870@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:09:14AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> That's an optimization I can look into agreed. I guess I just added
> one line and not even think too much at optimizing this,
> split_huge_page isn't in a fast path.
So this would more or less be the optimization (untested):
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1169,8 +1169,8 @@ static void __split_huge_page_refcount(s
atomic_sub(page_mapcount(page_tail), &page->_count);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page->_count) <= 0);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page_tail->_count) != 0);
- atomic_add(page_mapcount(page) + 1, &page_tail->_count);
- atomic_add(page_mapcount(page_tail), &page_tail->_count);
+ atomic_add(page_mapcount(page) + page_mapcount(page_tail) + 1,
+ &page_tail->_count);
/* after clearing PageTail the gup refcount can be released */
smp_mb();
This might also be possible but I'm scared by it because the value
would be set by the C language without locked op, and I wonder then
what happens with get_page_unless_zero runs. Now we relay on atomic
(without lock prefix) writes from C for all pagetable updates
already. So I guess this might actually work ok too in
practice. get_page_unless_zero not incrementing anything sounds
unlikely, and it's hard to see how it could increment zero or a random
value if the "long" write is done in a single asm insn (like we relay
in other places). But still the above is obviously safe, the below far
less obvious and generally one always is forced to use locked ops on
any region of memory concurrently modified to have a deterministic
result. And there's nothing anywhere doing atomic_set on page->_count
except at boot where there are no races before the pages are visible
to the buddy allocator. So for now I'll stick to the above version
unless somebody can guarantee the safety of the below (which I can't).
Comments welcome..
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1169,8 +1169,8 @@ static void __split_huge_page_refcount(s
atomic_sub(page_mapcount(page_tail), &page->_count);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page->_count) <= 0);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page_tail->_count) != 0);
- atomic_add(page_mapcount(page) + 1, &page_tail->_count);
- atomic_add(page_mapcount(page_tail), &page_tail->_count);
+ atomic_set(&page_tail->_count,
+ page_mapcount(page) + page_mapcount(page_tail) + 1);
/* after clearing PageTail the gup refcount can be released */
smp_mb();
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-19 7:48 [PATCH 0/9] Use RCU to stabilize page counts Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: rcu read lock for getting reference on pages in migration_entry_wait() Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: avoid calling get_page_unless_zero() when charging cgroups Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: rcu read lock when getting from tail to head page Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: use get_page in deactivate_page() Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] kvm: use get_page instead of get_page_unless_zero Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: assert that get_page_unless_zero() callers hold the rcu lock Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 23:28 ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] rcu: rcu_get_gp_cookie() / rcu_gp_cookie_elapsed() stand-ins Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: add API for setting a grace period cookie on compound pages Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: make sure tail page counts are stable before splitting THP pages Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-19 7:53 ` [PATCH 0/9] Use RCU to stabilize page counts Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-22 21:33 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-23 14:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-23 16:45 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-23 16:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-23 19:52 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-24 0:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-24 0:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-08-24 13:34 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #2 Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-26 6:24 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-26 16:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-26 18:54 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #3 Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-27 9:41 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-27 17:34 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #4 Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-29 4:20 ` Minchan Kim
2011-09-01 15:24 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #5 Andrea Arcangeli
2011-09-01 22:27 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-09-01 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-01 23:45 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-02 0:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-09-02 1:17 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-02 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-08 16:51 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #6 Andrea Arcangeli
2011-09-23 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-30 13:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:37 ` thp: gup_fast ppc tail refcounting [was Re: [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #6] Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc: remove superfluous PageTail checks on the pte gup_fast Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc: get_hugepte() don't put_page() the wrong page Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc: gup_hugepte() avoid to free the head page too many times Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc: gup_hugepte() support THP based tail recounting Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:40 ` thp: gup_fast ppc tail refcounting [was Re: [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #6] Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc: remove superfluous PageTail checks on the pte gup_fast Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc: get_hugepte() don't put_page() the wrong page Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc: gup_hugepte() avoid to free the head page too many times Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-16 20:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc: gup_hugepte() support THP based tail recounting Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 14:41 ` thp: gup_fast s390/sparc tail refcounting [was Re: [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #6] Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390: gup_huge_pmd() support THP tail recounting Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] sparc: gup_pte_range() support THP based " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 22:44 ` David Miller
2011-10-17 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] thp: share get_huge_page_tail() Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 21:32 ` fix two more s390/sparc gup_fast bugs Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] s390: gup_huge_pmd() return 0 if pte changes Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-29 22:40 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #4 Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-29 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-26 19:28 ` [PATCH] thp: tail page refcounting fix #2 Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110824002717.GI23870@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox