linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, khlebnikov@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:57:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110823095752.GB3162@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110823093520.GA4938@infradead.org>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:35:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> > index b931415..79bf47c 100644
> > --- a/fs/dcache.c
> > +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> > @@ -269,10 +269,10 @@ static void dentry_lru_move_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
> >  	spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
> >  	if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
> >  		list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
> > -		dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
> > -		this_cpu_inc(nr_dentry_unused);
> >  	} else {
> >  		list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
> > +		dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
> > +		this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
> >  	}
> >  	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
> 
> I suspect at this point it might be more obvious to simply remove
> dentry_lru_move_list.  Just call dentry_lru_del to remove it from the
> lru, and then we can add it to the local dispose list without the need
> of any locking, similar to how it is done for inodes already.

Yeah, that is what is done in the next patch when converting to the
generic LRU list code. I can probably pull this back into this patch
and just remove dentry_lru_move_list(0 right here.

> 
> >  		if (dentry->d_count) {
> > -			dentry_lru_del(dentry);
> >  			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> >  			continue;
> >  		}
> > @@ -789,6 +794,8 @@ relock:
> >  			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> >  		} else {
> >  			list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &tmp);
> > +			this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
> > +			sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
> 
> It might be more obvious to use __dentry_lru_del + an opencoded list_add
> here.

This goes away completely in the next patch, so I don't think it
matters that much...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-23  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-23  8:56 [PATCH 00/12] RFC: shrinker APi rework and generic LRU lists Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 01/13] fs: Use a common define for inode slab caches Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  9:20     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  6:16       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 02/13] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-24 14:12   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 03/13] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 04/13] mm: new shrinker API Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  9:23     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  6:17       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 05/13] mm: convert shrinkers to use new API Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  9:35   ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-08-26 17:09   ` Wanlong Gao
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 06/13] shrinker: remove old API now it is unused Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 07/13] Use atomic-long operations instead of looping around cmpxchg() Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 08/13] list: add a new LRU list type Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  9:32     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:58       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-24 14:24         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 09/13] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  6:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  6:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 11/13] dcache: use a dispose list in select_parent Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-05  9:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 12/13] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Dave Chinner
2011-08-23  9:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23  9:57     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-08-23  8:56 ` [PATCH 13/13] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Dave Chinner
2011-08-24  6:32   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110823095752.GB3162@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox