From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>,
Ciju Rajan K <ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] writeback: make background writeback cgroup aware
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:35:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110818163552.f525225c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xr93hb5ftbhy.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:38:49 -0700
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:10:56 -0700
> > Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:15:03 -0700
> >> > Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> When the system is under background dirty memory threshold but some
> >> >> cgroups are over their background dirty memory thresholds, then only
> >> >> writeback inodes associated with the over-limit cgroups.
> >> >>
> >> >> In addition to checking if the system dirty memory usage is over the
> >> >> system background threshold, over_bground_thresh() now checks if any
> >> >> cgroups are over their respective background dirty memory thresholds.
> >> >>
> >> >> If over-limit cgroups are found, then the new
> >> >> wb_writeback_work.for_cgroup field is set to distinguish between system
> >> >> and memcg overages. The new wb_writeback_work.shared_inodes field is
> >> >> also set. Inodes written by multiple cgroup are marked owned by
> >> >> I_MEMCG_SHARED rather than a particular cgroup. Such shared inodes
> >> >> cannot easily be attributed to a cgroup, so per-cgroup writeback
> >> >> (futures version of wakeup_flusher_threads and balance_dirty_pages)
> >> >> performs suboptimally in the presence of shared inodes. Therefore,
> >> >> write shared inodes when performing cgroup background writeback.
> >> >>
> >> >> If performing cgroup writeback, move_expired_inodes() skips inodes that
> >> >> do not contribute dirty pages to the cgroup being written back.
> >> >>
> >> >> After writing some pages, wb_writeback() will call
> >> >> mem_cgroup_writeback_done() to update the set of over-bg-limits memcg.
> >> >>
> >> >> This change also makes wakeup_flusher_threads() memcg aware so that
> >> >> per-cgroup try_to_free_pages() is able to operate more efficiently
> >> >> without having to write pages of foreign containers. This change adds a
> >> >> mem_cgroup parameter to wakeup_flusher_threads() to allow callers,
> >> >> especially try_to_free_pages() and foreground writeback from
> >> >> balance_dirty_pages(), to specify a particular cgroup to write inodes
> >> >> from.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> Changelog since v8:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Added optional memcg parameter to __bdi_start_writeback(),
> >> >> bdi_start_writeback(), wakeup_flusher_threads(), writeback_inodes_wb().
> >> >>
> >> >> - move_expired_inodes() now uses pass in struct wb_writeback_work instead of
> >> >> struct writeback_control.
> >> >>
> >> >> - Added comments to over_bground_thresh().
> >> >>
> >> >> fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
> >> >> fs/fs-writeback.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> >> fs/sync.c | 2 +-
> >> >> include/linux/writeback.h | 6 ++-
> >> >> mm/backing-dev.c | 3 +-
> >> >> mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +-
> >> >> mm/vmscan.c | 3 +-
> >> >> 7 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> >> >> index dd0220b..da1fb23 100644
> >> >> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> >> >> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> >> >> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void free_more_memory(void)
> >> >> struct zone *zone;
> >> >> int nid;
> >> >>
> >> >> - wakeup_flusher_threads(1024);
> >> >> + wakeup_flusher_threads(1024, NULL);
> >> >> yield();
> >> >>
> >> >> for_each_online_node(nid) {
> >> >> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> >> >> index e91fb82..ba55336 100644
> >> >> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> >> >> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> >> >> @@ -38,10 +38,14 @@ struct wb_writeback_work {
> >> >> struct super_block *sb;
> >> >> unsigned long *older_than_this;
> >> >> enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
> >> >> + unsigned short memcg_id; /* If non-zero, then writeback specified
> >> >> + * cgroup. */
> >> >> unsigned int tagged_writepages:1;
> >> >> unsigned int for_kupdate:1;
> >> >> unsigned int range_cyclic:1;
> >> >> unsigned int for_background:1;
> >> >> + unsigned int for_cgroup:1; /* cgroup writeback */
> >> >> + unsigned int shared_inodes:1; /* write inodes spanning cgroups */
> >> >>
> >> >> struct list_head list; /* pending work list */
> >> >> struct completion *done; /* set if the caller waits */
> >> >> @@ -114,9 +118,12 @@ static void bdi_queue_work(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> >> >> spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> +/*
> >> >> + * @memcg is optional. If set, then limit writeback to the specified cgroup.
> >> >> + */
> >> >> static void
> >> >> __bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, long nr_pages,
> >> >> - bool range_cyclic)
> >> >> + bool range_cyclic, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >> >> {
> >> >> struct wb_writeback_work *work;
> >> >>
> >> >> @@ -136,6 +143,8 @@ __bdi_start_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, long nr_pages,
> >> >> work->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE;
> >> >> work->nr_pages = nr_pages;
> >> >> work->range_cyclic = range_cyclic;
> >> >> + work->memcg_id = memcg ? css_id(mem_cgroup_css(memcg)) : 0;
> >> >> + work->for_cgroup = memcg != NULL;
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I couldn't find a patch for mem_cgroup_css(NULL). Is it in patch 1-10 ?
> >> > Other parts seems ok to me.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > -Kame
> >>
> >> Mainline commit d324236b3333e87c8825b35f2104184734020d35 adds
> >> mem_cgroup_css() to memcontrol.c. The above code does not call
> >> mem_cgroup_css() with a NULL parameter due to the 'memcg ? ...' check.
> >> So I do not think any additional changes to mem_cgroup_css() are needed.
> >> Am I missing your point?
> >>
> >
> > I thought you need
> > ==
> > struct cgroup_subsys_state *mem_cgroup_css(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> > {
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return NULL;
> > return &mem->css;
> > }
> > ==
> > And
> > ==
> > unsigned short css_id(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> > {
> > struct css_id *cssid;
> >
> > + if (!css)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > ==
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Kame
>
> I think that your changes to mem_cgroup_css() and css_id() are
> unnecessary for my patches because my patches do not call
> mem_cgroup_css(NULL). The "?" check below prevents NULL from being
> passed into mem_cgroup_css():
>
> + work->memcg_id = memcg ? css_id(mem_cgroup_css(memcg)) : 0;
>
Ah, I see. Thank you for clarification.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 16:14 [PATCH v9 00/13] memcg: per cgroup dirty page limiting Greg Thelen
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 01/13] memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces Greg Thelen
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] memcg: add page_cgroup flags for dirty page tracking Greg Thelen
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] memcg: add dirty page accounting infrastructure Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 0:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 6:07 ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] memcg: add kernel calls for memcg dirty page stats Greg Thelen
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] memcg: add mem_cgroup_mark_inode_dirty() Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 0:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] memcg: add dirty limits to mem_cgroup Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 0:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-17 16:14 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 0:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] memcg: dirty page accounting support routines Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 1:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 7:04 ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] memcg: create support routines for writeback Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 1:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] writeback: pass wb_writeback_work into move_expired_inodes() Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 1:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] writeback: make background writeback cgroup aware Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 1:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 7:10 ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 7:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 7:38 ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 7:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-08-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] memcg: create support routines for page writeback Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 1:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 2:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-18 10:12 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-18 12:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-18 20:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-19 1:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] memcg: check memcg dirty limits in " Greg Thelen
2011-08-18 1:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-18 0:35 ` [PATCH v9 00/13] memcg: per cgroup dirty page limiting KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110818163552.f525225c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@betterlinux.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox