From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A729790014E for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:00:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:59:53 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] memcg : pass scan nodemask Message-ID: <20110801135953.GE25251@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20110727144438.a9fdfd5b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110727144742.420cf69c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110727144742.420cf69c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" On Wed 27-07-11 14:47:42, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > pass memcg's nodemask to try_to_free_pages(). > > try_to_free_pages can take nodemask as its argument but memcg > doesn't pass it. Considering memcg can be used with cpuset on > big NUMA, memcg should pass nodemask if available. > > Now, memcg maintain nodemask with periodic updates. pass it. > > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > --- > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +- > mm/memcontrol.c | 8 ++++++-- > mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > [...] > Index: mmotm-0710/mm/vmscan.c > =================================================================== > --- mmotm-0710.orig/mm/vmscan.c > +++ mmotm-0710/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -2280,6 +2280,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag > unsigned long nr_reclaimed; > unsigned long start, end; > int nid; > + nodemask_t *mask; > struct scan_control sc = { > .may_writepage = !laptop_mode, > .may_unmap = 1, > @@ -2302,7 +2303,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag > * take care of from where we get pages. So the node where we start the > * scan does not need to be the current node. > */ > - nid = mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(mem_cont); > + nid = mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(mem_cont, &mask); The mask is not used anywhere AFAICS and using it is a point of the patch AFAIU. I guess you wanted to use &sc.nodemask, right? Other than that, looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org