From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg: do not try to drain per-cpu caches without pages
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:12:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721191250.1c945740.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <113c4affc2f0938b7b22d43c88d2b0a623de9a6b.1311241300.git.mhocko@suse.cz>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:38:00 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> drain_all_stock_async tries to optimize a work to be done on the work
> queue by excluding any work for the current CPU because it assumes that
> the context we are called from already tried to charge from that cache
> and it's failed so it must be empty already.
> While the assumption is correct we can do it by checking the current
> number of pages in the cache. This will also reduce a work on other CPUs
> with an empty stock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
At the first look, when a charge against TransParentHugepage() goes
into the reclaim routine, stock->nr_pages != 0 and this will
call additional kworker.
nr_pages check itself seems good.
Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++------------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f11f198..786bffb 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *mem, unsigned int nr_pages)
> */
> static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
> {
> - int cpu, curcpu;
> + int cpu;
> /*
> * If someone calls draining, avoid adding more kworker runs.
> */
> @@ -2148,22 +2148,12 @@ static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
> return;
> /* Notify other cpus that system-wide "drain" is running */
> get_online_cpus();
> - /*
> - * Get a hint for avoiding draining charges on the current cpu,
> - * which must be exhausted by our charging. It is not required that
> - * this be a precise check, so we use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of
> - * getcpu()/putcpu().
> - */
> - curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
> struct mem_cgroup *mem;
>
> - if (cpu == curcpu)
> - continue;
> -
> mem = stock->cached;
> - if (!mem)
> + if (!mem || !stock->nr_pages)
> continue;
> if (mem != root_mem) {
> if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy)
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 9:41 [PATCH 0/4] memcg: cleanup per-cpu charge caches + fix unnecessary reclaim if there are still cached charges Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: do not try to drain per-cpu caches without pages Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 10:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-07-21 11:36 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 23:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-22 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-22 9:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-22 9:58 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-22 10:23 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 7:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: unify sync and async per-cpu charge cache draining Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 10:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-21 11:36 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: get rid of percpu_charge_mutex lock Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 10:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-21 11:47 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 12:42 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 23:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-22 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-22 0:27 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-07-22 9:41 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 8:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: prevent from reclaiming if there are per-cpu cached charges Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 10:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-21 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 23:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-22 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-07-22 9:54 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-22 12:43 [PATCH 0/4 v2] memcg: cleanup per-cpu charge caches Michal Hocko
2011-07-21 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: do not try to drain per-cpu caches without pages Michal Hocko
2011-07-25 1:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721191250.1c945740.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox