From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15A476B004A for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:32:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] drivers: add Contiguous Memory Allocator Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:31:59 +0200 References: <1309851710-3828-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <201107061651.49824.arnd@arndb.de> <20110706154857.GG8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110706154857.GG8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107061831.59739.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Daniel Walker' , 'Jonathan Corbet' , 'Mel Gorman' , 'Chunsang Jeong' , 'Jesse Barker' , 'KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki' , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Michal Nazarewicz' , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, 'Kyungmin Park' , 'Ankita Garg' , 'Andrew Morton' , Marek Szyprowski , linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:51:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > I don't see how. The pages get allocated from an unmapped area > > or memory, mapped into the kernel address space as uncached or wc > > and then cleared. This should be the same for lowmem or highmem > > pages. > > You don't want to clear them via their uncached or WC mapping, but via > their cached mapping _before_ they get their alternative mapping, and > flush any cached out of that mapping - both L1 and L2 caches. But there can't be any other mapping, which is the whole point of the exercise to use highmem. Quoting from the new dma_alloc_area() function: c = arm_vmregion_alloc(&area->vm, align, size, gfp & ~(__GFP_DMA | __GFP_HIGHMEM)); if (!c) return NULL; memset((void *)c->vm_start, 0, size); area->vm here points to an uncached location, which means that we already zero the data through the uncached mapping. I don't see how it's getting worse than it is already. > > > Another issue is that when a platform has restricted DMA regions, > > > they typically don't fall into the highmem zone. As the dmabounce > > > code allocates from the DMA coherent allocator to provide it with > > > guaranteed DMA-able memory, that would be rather inconvenient. > > > > True. The dmabounce code would consequently have to allocate > > the memory through an internal function that avoids the > > contiguous allocation area and goes straight to ZONE_DMA memory > > as it does today. > > CMA's whole purpose for existing is to provide _dma-able_ contiguous > memory for things like cameras and such like found on crippled non- > scatter-gather hardware. If that memory is not DMA-able what's the > point? I mean not any ZONE_DMA memory, but the memory backing coherent_areas[], which is by definition DMA-able from any device and is what is currently being used for the purpose. Arnd -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org