From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"bsingharora@gmail.com" <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Fix mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() to do stable hierarchy walk.
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:33:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110622183249.GA27191@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110622151500.GF14343@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Wed 22-06-11 17:15:00, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 16-06-11 12:51:41, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -1667,41 +1668,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> > if (!check_soft && root_mem->memsw_is_minimum)
> > noswap = true;
> >
> > - while (1) {
> > +again:
> > + if (!shrink) {
> > + visit = 0;
> > + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(victim, root_mem)
> > + visit++;
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * At shrinking, we check the usage again in caller side.
> > + * so, visit children one by one.
> > + */
> > + visit = 1;
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * We are not draining per cpu cached charges during soft limit reclaim
> > + * because global reclaim doesn't care about charges. It tries to free
> > + * some memory and charges will not give any.
> > + */
> > + if (!check_soft)
> > + drain_all_stock_async(root_mem);
> > +
> > + while (visit--) {
>
> This is racy, isn't it? What prevents some groups to disapear in the
> meantime? We would reclaim from those that are left more that we want.
>
> Why cannot we simply do something like (totally untested):
>
> Index: linus_tree/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linus_tree.orig/mm/memcontrol.c 2011-06-22 17:11:54.000000000 +0200
> +++ linus_tree/mm/memcontrol.c 2011-06-22 17:13:05.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> unsigned long reclaim_options,
> unsigned long *total_scanned)
> {
> - struct mem_cgroup *victim;
> + struct mem_cgroup *victim, *first_victim = NULL;
> int ret, total = 0;
> int loop = 0;
> bool noswap = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
> @@ -1669,6 +1669,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
>
> while (1) {
> victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
> + if (!first_victim)
> + first_victim = victim;
> + else if (first_victim == victim)
> + break;
this will obviously need css_get and css_put to make sure that the group
doesn't disappear in the meantime.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 3:47 [PATCH 0/7] memcg numa node scan update KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] Fix mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() to do stable hierarchy walk KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-22 18:33 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-06-23 6:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 3:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] export memory cgroup's swappines by mem_cgroup_swappiness() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-22 16:31 ` Ying Han
2011-06-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: add memory.scan_stat KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-17 22:04 ` Ying Han
2011-06-19 23:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-20 4:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-20 6:59 ` Ying Han
2011-06-21 6:49 ` Ying Han
2011-06-21 6:52 ` Ying Han
2011-06-22 0:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-24 21:40 ` Ying Han
2011-06-27 1:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 3:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg: update numa information based on event counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 6:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-23 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-16 3:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] Fix not good check of mem_cgroup_local_usage() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-17 22:27 ` Ying Han
2011-06-19 23:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-16 3:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg: calc NUMA node's weight for scan KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-23 13:35 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 14:27 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-16 3:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: proportional fair vicitm node selection KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-23 13:48 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 14:10 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-23 14:30 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 22:20 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110622183249.GA27191@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox