From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ciju Rajan K <ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/12] memcg: create support routines for page-writeback
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:01:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110608090132.ef9ccb91.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xr93tyc1ws4n.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:58:16 -0700
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:12:16 -0700
> > Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Introduce memcg routines to assist in per-memcg dirty page management:
> >>
> >> - mem_cgroup_balance_dirty_pages() walks a memcg hierarchy comparing
> >> dirty memory usage against memcg foreground and background thresholds.
> >> If an over-background-threshold memcg is found, then per-memcg
> >> background writeback is queued. Per-memcg writeback differs from
> >> classic, non-memcg, per bdi writeback by setting the new
> >> writeback_control.for_cgroup bit.
> >>
> >> If an over-foreground-threshold memcg is found, then foreground
> >> writeout occurs. When performing foreground writeout, first consider
> >> inodes exclusive to the memcg. If unable to make enough progress,
> >> then consider inodes shared between memcg. Such cross-memcg inode
> >> sharing likely to be rare in situations that use per-cgroup memory
> >> isolation. The approach tries to handle the common (non-shared)
> >> case well without punishing well behaved (non-sharing) cgroups.
> >> As a last resort writeback shared inodes.
> >>
> >> This routine is used by balance_dirty_pages() in a later change.
> >>
> >> - mem_cgroup_hierarchical_dirty_info() returns the dirty memory usage
> >> and limits of the memcg closest to (or over) its dirty limit. This
> >> will be used by throttle_vm_writeout() in a latter change.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changelog since v7:
> >> - Add more detail to commit description.
> >>
> >> - Declare the new writeback_control for_cgroup bit in this change, the
> >> first patch that uses the new field is first used. In -v7 the field
> >> was declared in a separate patch.
> >>
> >> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 18 +++++
> >> include/linux/writeback.h | 1 +
> >> include/trace/events/memcontrol.h | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> mm/memcontrol.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> >> index 3d72e09..0d0363e 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> >> @@ -167,6 +167,11 @@ bool should_writeback_mem_cgroup_inode(struct inode *inode,
> >> struct writeback_control *wbc);
> >> bool mem_cgroups_over_bground_dirty_thresh(void);
> >> void mem_cgroup_writeback_done(void);
> >> +bool mem_cgroup_hierarchical_dirty_info(unsigned long sys_available_mem,
> >> + struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >> + struct dirty_info *info);
> >> +void mem_cgroup_balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> >> + unsigned long write_chunk);
> >>
> >> unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
> >> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >> @@ -383,6 +388,19 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_writeback_done(void)
> >> {
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static inline void mem_cgroup_balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> >> + unsigned long write_chunk)
> >> +{
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline bool
> >> +mem_cgroup_hierarchical_dirty_info(unsigned long sys_available_mem,
> >> + struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >> + struct dirty_info *info)
> >> +{
> >> + return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static inline
> >> unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
> >> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> >> index 66ec339..4f5c0d2 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct writeback_control {
> >> unsigned for_reclaim:1; /* Invoked from the page allocator */
> >> unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */
> >> unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */
> >> + unsigned for_cgroup:1; /* enable cgroup writeback */
> >> unsigned shared_inodes:1; /* write inodes spanning cgroups */
> >> };
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/trace/events/memcontrol.h b/include/trace/events/memcontrol.h
> >> index 326a66b..b42dae1 100644
> >> --- a/include/trace/events/memcontrol.h
> >> +++ b/include/trace/events/memcontrol.h
> >> @@ -109,6 +109,89 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mem_cgroups_over_bground_dirty_thresh,
> >> __entry->first_id)
> >> )
> >>
> >> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mem_cgroup_consider_writeback,
> >> + TP_PROTO(unsigned short css_id,
> >> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> >> + unsigned long nr_reclaimable,
> >> + unsigned long thresh,
> >> + bool over_limit),
> >> +
> >> + TP_ARGS(css_id, bdi, nr_reclaimable, thresh, over_limit),
> >> +
> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >> + __field(unsigned short, css_id)
> >> + __field(struct backing_dev_info *, bdi)
> >> + __field(unsigned long, nr_reclaimable)
> >> + __field(unsigned long, thresh)
> >> + __field(bool, over_limit)
> >> + ),
> >> +
> >> + TP_fast_assign(
> >> + __entry->css_id = css_id;
> >> + __entry->bdi = bdi;
> >> + __entry->nr_reclaimable = nr_reclaimable;
> >> + __entry->thresh = thresh;
> >> + __entry->over_limit = over_limit;
> >> + ),
> >> +
> >> + TP_printk("css_id=%d bdi=%p nr_reclaimable=%ld thresh=%ld "
> >> + "over_limit=%d", __entry->css_id, __entry->bdi,
> >> + __entry->nr_reclaimable, __entry->thresh, __entry->over_limit)
> >> +)
> >> +
> >> +#define DEFINE_MEM_CGROUP_CONSIDER_WRITEBACK_EVENT(name) \
> >> +DEFINE_EVENT(mem_cgroup_consider_writeback, name, \
> >> + TP_PROTO(unsigned short id, \
> >> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi, \
> >> + unsigned long nr_reclaimable, \
> >> + unsigned long thresh, \
> >> + bool over_limit), \
> >> + TP_ARGS(id, bdi, nr_reclaimable, thresh, over_limit) \
> >> +)
> >> +
> >> +DEFINE_MEM_CGROUP_CONSIDER_WRITEBACK_EVENT(mem_cgroup_consider_bg_writeback);
> >> +DEFINE_MEM_CGROUP_CONSIDER_WRITEBACK_EVENT(mem_cgroup_consider_fg_writeback);
> >> +
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(mem_cgroup_fg_writeback,
> >> + TP_PROTO(unsigned long write_chunk,
> >> + struct writeback_control *wbc),
> >> +
> >> + TP_ARGS(write_chunk, wbc),
> >> +
> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >> + __field(unsigned long, write_chunk)
> >> + __field(long, wbc_to_write)
> >> + __field(bool, shared_inodes)
> >> + ),
> >> +
> >> + TP_fast_assign(
> >> + __entry->write_chunk = write_chunk;
> >> + __entry->wbc_to_write = wbc->nr_to_write;
> >> + __entry->shared_inodes = wbc->shared_inodes;
> >> + ),
> >> +
> >> + TP_printk("write_chunk=%ld nr_to_write=%ld shared_inodes=%d",
> >> + __entry->write_chunk,
> >> + __entry->wbc_to_write,
> >> + __entry->shared_inodes)
> >> +)
> >> +
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(mem_cgroup_enable_shared_writeback,
> >> + TP_PROTO(unsigned short css_id),
> >> +
> >> + TP_ARGS(css_id),
> >> +
> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >> + __field(unsigned short, css_id)
> >> + ),
> >> +
> >> + TP_fast_assign(
> >> + __entry->css_id = css_id;
> >> + ),
> >> +
> >> + TP_printk("enabling shared writeback for memcg %d", __entry->css_id)
> >> +)
> >> +
> >> #endif /* _TRACE_MEMCONTROL_H */
> >>
> >> /* This part must be outside protection */
> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> index a5b1794..17cb888 100644
> >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> @@ -1622,6 +1622,156 @@ void mem_cgroup_writeback_done(void)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * This routine must be called by processes which are generating dirty pages.
> >> + * It considers the dirty pages usage and thresholds of the current cgroup and
> >> + * (depending if hierarchical accounting is enabled) ancestral memcg. If any of
> >> + * the considered memcg are over their background dirty limit, then background
> >> + * writeback is queued. If any are over the foreground dirty limit then
> >> + * throttle the dirtying task while writing dirty data. The per-memcg dirty
> >> + * limits check by this routine are distinct from either the per-system,
> >> + * per-bdi, or per-task limits considered by balance_dirty_pages().
> >> + */
> >> +void mem_cgroup_balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> >> + unsigned long write_chunk)
> >> +{
> >> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
> >> + struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> >> + struct mem_cgroup *ref_mem;
> >> + struct dirty_info info;
> >> + unsigned long nr_reclaimable;
> >> + unsigned long sys_available_mem;
> >> + unsigned long pause = 1;
> >> + unsigned short id;
> >> + bool over;
> >> + bool shared_inodes;
> >> +
> >> + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + sys_available_mem = determine_dirtyable_memory();
> >> +
> >> + /* reference the memcg so it is not deleted during this routine */
> >> + rcu_read_lock();
> >> + mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
> >> + if (mem && mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> >> + mem = NULL;
> >> + if (mem)
> >> + css_get(&mem->css);
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >> + ref_mem = mem;
> >> +
> >> + /* balance entire ancestry of current's mem. */
> >> + for (; mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(mem); mem = parent_mem_cgroup(mem)) {
> >> + id = css_id(&mem->css);
> >> +
> >
> > Hmm, this sounds natural...but...don't we need to restart checking from ref_mem's
> > dirty_ratio once we find an ancestor is over dirty_ratio and we slept ?
> >
> > Even if parent's dirty ratio comes to be clean state, children's may not.
> > So, I think some "restart loop" jump after io_schedule_timeout().
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Kame
>
> I do not think that we need to restart, but maybe you have a case in
> mind that I am not considering.
>
> Example hierarchy:
> root
> A B
> A1 A2
> A11 A12 A21 A22
>
> Assume that mem_cgroup_balance_dirty_pages(A11), so ref_mem=A11.
>
> We start at A11 and walk up towards the root. If A11 is over limit,
> then write A11 until under limit. Next check A1, if over limit then
> write A1,A11,A12. Then check A. If A is over A limit, then we invoke
> writeback on A* until A is under A limit. Are you concerned that while
> performing writeback on A* that other tasks may push A1 over the A1
> limit? Such other task writers would also be calling
> mem_cgroup_balance_dirty_pages() later.
>
Hm, ok. Could you add comments to explain the algorithm ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-03 16:12 [PATCH v8 00/12] memcg: per cgroup dirty page accounting Greg Thelen
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces Greg Thelen
2011-06-04 9:54 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] memcg: add page_cgroup flags for dirty page tracking Greg Thelen
2011-06-04 9:56 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] memcg: add mem_cgroup_mark_inode_dirty() Greg Thelen
2011-06-03 23:09 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-03 23:45 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-07 7:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] memcg: add dirty page accounting infrastructure Greg Thelen
2011-06-04 10:11 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-07 7:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] memcg: add kernel calls for memcg dirty page stats Greg Thelen
2011-06-04 15:42 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] memcg: add dirty limits to mem_cgroup Greg Thelen
2011-06-04 15:57 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits Greg Thelen
2011-06-04 16:04 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] memcg: dirty page accounting support routines Greg Thelen
2011-06-07 7:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] memcg: create support routines for writeback Greg Thelen
2011-06-05 2:46 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-07 7:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] memcg: create support routines for page-writeback Greg Thelen
2011-06-05 3:11 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 18:47 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-07 8:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 15:58 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-08 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-06-08 1:50 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-03 16:12 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] writeback: make background writeback cgroup aware Greg Thelen
2011-06-05 4:11 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 18:51 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-07 8:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 19:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-07 19:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-07 20:43 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-07 21:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-08 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-08 4:02 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-08 4:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-08 5:20 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-08 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-08 20:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 17:55 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-09 21:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 22:21 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-03 22:46 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] memcg: per cgroup dirty page accounting Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-03 22:50 ` Greg Thelen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110608090132.ef9ccb91.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox