From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, qcui@redhat.com,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 36192] New: Kernel panic when boot the 2.6.39+ kernel based off of 2.6.32 kernel
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:55:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110607165537.dc9e8888.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110607075131.GB22234@cmpxchg.org>
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:51:31 +0200
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:57:08AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:45:19 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hopefully he can test this one for us as well, thanks.
> > >
> >
> > A patch with better description (of mine) is here.
> > Anyway, I felt I needed a fix for ARM special case.
>
> It's a different issue that warrants a separate patch, I think.
>
> > fix-init-page_cgroup-for-sparsemem-taking-care-of-broken-page-flags.patch
> > Even with SPARSEMEM, there are some magical memmap.
> >
> > If a Node is not aligned to SECTION, memmap of pfn which is out of
> > Node's range is not initialized. And page->flags contains 0.
> >
> > If Node(0) doesn't exist, NODE_DATA(pfn_to_nid(pfn)) causes error.
> >
> > In another case, for example, ARM frees memmap which is never be used
> > even under SPARSEMEM. In that case, page->flags will contain broken
> > value.
> >
> > This patch does a strict check on nid which is obtained by
> > pfn_to_page() and use proper NID for page_cgroup allocation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > ---
> > mm/page_cgroup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-3.0-rc1/mm/page_cgroup.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-3.0-rc1.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
> > +++ linux-3.0-rc1/mm/page_cgroup.c
> > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int __meminit init_section_page_c
> > struct mem_section *section;
> > unsigned long table_size;
> > unsigned long nr;
> > + unsigned long tmp;
> > int nid, index;
> >
> > nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
> > @@ -175,8 +176,41 @@ static int __meminit init_section_page_c
> >
> > if (section->page_cgroup)
> > return 0;
> > + /*
> > + * check Node-ID. Because we get 'pfn' which is obtained by calculation,
> > + * the pfn may "not exist" or "alreay freed". Even if pfn_valid() returns
> > + * true, page->flags may contain broken value and pfn_to_nid() returns
> > + * bad value.
> > + * (See CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL and ARM's free_memmap())
> > + * So, we need to do careful check, here.
> > + */
> > + for (tmp = pfn;
> > + tmp < pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> > + tmp += MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, nid = -1) {
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + if (!pfn_valid(tmp))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + page = pfn_to_page(tmp);
> > + nid = page_to_nid(page);
> >
> > - nid = page_to_nid(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> > + /*
> > + * If 'page' isn't initialized or freed, it may contains broken
> > + * information.
> > + */
> > + if (!node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
> > + continue;
> > + if (page_to_pfn(pfn_to_page(tmp)) != tmp)
> > + continue;
>
> This looks quite elaborate just to figure out the node id.
>
Hm, but Node is not required to be aligned to section. Okay ?
> Here is what I wrote before I went with the sparsemem model fix (with
> a modified changelog, because it also fixed the off-node range
> problem).
>
> It just iterates nodes in the first place, so the node id is never a
> question. The memory hotplug callback still relies on pfn_to_nid()
> but ARM, at least as of now, does not support hotplug anyway.
>
> What do you think?
>
I have a concern. see below.
> ---
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Subject: [patch] page_cgroup: do not rely on memmap outside of node ranges
>
> On ARM, memmap for present sections may partially be released.
>
> As a consequence of this, a PFN walker like the page_cgroup array
> allocator may not rely on the struct page that corresponds to a
> pfn_present() PFN before it has been validated with something like
> memmap_valid_within().
>
> However, since this code only requires the node ID from the PFN range,
> this patch changes it from a pure PFN walker to a PFN in nodes walker.
> The node ID information is then inherently available through the node
> that is currently being walked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> index 74ccff6..46b6814 100644
> --- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -162,13 +162,13 @@ static void free_page_cgroup(void *addr)
> }
> #endif
>
> -static int __meminit init_section_page_cgroup(unsigned long pfn)
> +static int __meminit init_section_page_cgroup(int nid, unsigned long pfn)
> {
> struct page_cgroup *base, *pc;
> struct mem_section *section;
> unsigned long table_size;
> unsigned long nr;
> - int nid, index;
> + int index;
>
> nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
> section = __nr_to_section(nr);
> @@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ static int __meminit init_section_page_cgroup(unsigned long pfn)
> if (section->page_cgroup)
> return 0;
>
> - nid = page_to_nid(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> table_size = sizeof(struct page_cgroup) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> base = alloc_page_cgroup(table_size, nid);
>
> @@ -222,13 +221,16 @@ int __meminit online_page_cgroup(unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long start, end, pfn;
> int fail = 0;
>
> + if (nid < 0)
> + nid = pfn_to_nid(start_pfn);
> +
> start = start_pfn & ~(PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1);
> end = ALIGN(start_pfn + nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>
> for (pfn = start; !fail && pfn < end; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> if (!pfn_present(pfn))
> continue;
> - fail = init_section_page_cgroup(pfn);
> + fail = init_section_page_cgroup(nid, pfn);
> }
> if (!fail)
> return 0;
> @@ -283,23 +285,30 @@ static int __meminit page_cgroup_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>
> void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn;
> - int fail = 0;
> + pg_data_t *pgdat;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return;
>
> - for (pfn = 0; !fail && pfn < max_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> - if (!pfn_present(pfn))
> - continue;
> - fail = init_section_page_cgroup(pfn);
> - }
> - if (fail) {
> - printk(KERN_CRIT "try 'cgroup_disable=memory' boot option\n");
> - panic("Out of memory");
> - } else {
> - hotplug_memory_notifier(page_cgroup_callback, 0);
> + for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
> + unsigned long start;
> + unsigned long end;
> + unsigned long pfn;
> +
> + start = pgdat->node_start_pfn & ~(PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1);
> + end = ALIGN(pgdat->node_start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages,
> + PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> + for (pfn = start; pfn < end; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> + if (!pfn_present(pfn))
> + continue;
> + if (!init_section_page_cgroup(pgdat->node_id, pfn))
> + continue;
AFAIK, nodes can overlap. So, this [start, end) scan doesn't work. sections
may be initizalised mulitple times ...in wrong way. At here, what we can trust
is nid in page->flags or early_node_map[]?.
But that kind of record as early_node_map[] in __init section is....complicated.
Hmm, the problem is "boot failure" and it's scary and needed to be backported to
stable kernels. And stable kernels requires no-regression.
Can't we start from a band-aid ? We can clean up later.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-07 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-36192-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-05-30 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-30 7:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-30 7:12 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-30 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-30 7:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-30 8:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-06 12:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-06 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-06 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 8:45 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-07 8:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 9:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-07 9:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 10:18 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-07 23:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-08 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-08 7:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-08 8:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-08 9:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-08 10:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 1:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-09 1:42 ` [PATCH] [BUGFIX] Avoid getting nid from invalid struct page at page_cgroup allocation (as " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 7:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-07 7:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-06-07 10:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-07 23:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-08 9:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-07 9:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-07 9:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-07 10:13 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-07 8:37 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110607165537.dc9e8888.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=qcui@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox