linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: caiqian@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	rientjes@google.com, hughd@google.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix oom killer doesn't work at all if system have > gigabytes memory  (aka CAI founded issue)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:44:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606144458.GG1686@barrios-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DEC4463.1060206@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:07:15PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >> Of course, we recommend to drop privileges as far as possible
> >> instead of keeping them. Thus, oom killer don't have to check
> >> any capability. It implicitly suggest wrong programming style.
> >>
> >> This patch change root process check way from CAP_SYS_ADMIN to
> >> just euid==0.
> > 
> > I like this but I have some comments.
> > Firstly, it's not dependent with your series so I think this could
> > be merged firstly.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > Before that, I would like to make clear my concern.
> > As I look below comment, 3% bonus is dependent with __vm_enough_memory's logic?
> 
> No. completely independent.
> 
> vm_enough_memory() check the task _can_ allocate more memory. IOW, the task
> is subjective. And oom-killer check the task should be protected from oom-killer.
> IOW, the task is objective.
> 

Hmm, maybe I can't understand your point.
My though was below.

Assumption)
1. root allocation bonus point -> 10% 
2. OOM have no bonus about root process

Scenario)
1.
System has 101 free pages and 10 normal tasks.
Ideally, 10 tasks allocates free memory fairly so each task will have 10 pages.
So OOM killer can select victim fairly when new task which requires 10 pages forks.

2.
System has 101 free pages and 10 tasks. (9 normal task , 1 root task)
10 * 9 + 11 will be consumed. So each normal task will have 10 pages
but a root task have 11 pages.
So OOM killer can always selectd root process as vicim.(We assumed
OOM doesn't have a bonus on root process)

Conclusion)
For solving above problem, we have to give bonus which was given
in allocation to OOM, too. It's fair.
So I think it has a dependency.

-- 
Kind regards
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-06 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  8:00 KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-20  8:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] oom: improve dump_tasks() show items KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23 22:16   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-20  8:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] oom: kill younger process first KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23  2:37   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-23 22:20   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-20  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-ram internally KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23  3:59   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  1:14     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  1:32       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-23  4:02   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  1:44     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  3:11       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23 22:28   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-23 22:48     ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  1:21       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  8:32       ` CAI Qian
2011-05-26  7:08       ` CAI Qian
2011-05-27 19:12         ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  2:07     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-26  9:34   ` CAI Qian
2011-05-26  9:56     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-20  8:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] oom: don't kill random process KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23  4:31   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  1:53     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  8:46       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  8:49         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  9:04           ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  9:09             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  9:20               ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-24  9:38                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-23 22:32   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  1:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  1:39       ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  1:55         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-24  1:58           ` David Rientjes
2011-05-24  2:03             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-25 23:50               ` David Rientjes
2011-05-30  1:17                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:48                   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-31  4:54                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-20  8:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] oom: merge oom_kill_process() with oom_kill_task() KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  1:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix oom killer doesn't work at all if system have > gigabytes memory (aka CAI founded issue) CAI Qian
2011-05-31  4:10   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:14     ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  4:34       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:49       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:32     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  4:52     ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  7:04       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  7:50         ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  7:56           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31  7:59             ` CAI Qian
2011-05-31  8:11               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31 10:01                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-01  1:17                   ` CAI Qian
2011-06-01  3:32                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06  3:07                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-06 14:44                       ` Minchan Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110606144458.GG1686@barrios-laptop \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox