From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ury Stankevich <urykhy@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are isolated and caller is asynchronous
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:58:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110604065853.GA4114@barrios-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110603144941.GI7306@suse.de>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:49:41PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:09:20AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > > There is an explanation in here somewhere because as I write this,
> > > > the test machine has survived 14 hours under continual stress without
> > > > the isolated counters going negative with over 128 million pages
> > > > successfully migrated and a million pages failed to migrate due to
> > > > direct compaction being called 80,000 times. It's possible it's a
> > > > co-incidence but it's some co-incidence!
> > >
> > > No idea...
> >
> > I wasn't able to work on this most of the day but was looking at this
> > closer this evening again and I think I might have thought of another
> > theory that could cause this problem.
> >
> > When THP is isolating pages, it accounts for the pages isolated against
> > the zone of course. If it backs out, it finds the pages from the PTEs.
> > On !SMP but PREEMPT, we may not have adequate protection against a new
> > page from a different zone being inserted into the PTE causing us to
> > decrement against the wrong zone. While the global counter is fine,
> > the per-zone counters look corrupted. You'd still think it was the
> > anon counter tht got screwed rather than the file one if it really was
> > THP unfortunately so it's not the full picture. I'm going to start
> > a test monitoring both zoneinfo and vmstat to see if vmstat looks
> > fine while the per-zone counters that are negative are offset by a
> > positive count on the other zones that when added together become 0.
> > Hopefully it'll actually trigger overnight :/
> >
>
> Right idea of the wrong zone being accounted for but wrong place. I
> think the following patch should fix the problem;
>
> ==== CUT HERE ===
> mm: compaction: Ensure that the compaction free scanner does not move to the next zone
>
> Compaction works with two scanners, a migration and a free
> scanner. When the scanners crossover, migration within the zone is
> complete. The location of the scanner is recorded on each cycle to
> avoid excesive scanning.
>
> When a zone is small and mostly reserved, it's very easy for the
> migration scanner to be close to the end of the zone. Then the following
> situation can occurs
>
> o migration scanner isolates some pages near the end of the zone
> o free scanner starts at the end of the zone but finds that the
> migration scanner is already there
> o free scanner gets reinitialised for the next cycle as
> cc->migrate_pfn + pageblock_nr_pages
> moving the free scanner into the next zone
> o migration scanner moves into the next zone but continues accounting
> against the old zone
>
> When this happens, NR_ISOLATED accounting goes haywire because some
> of the accounting happens against the wrong zone. One zones counter
> remains positive while the other goes negative even though the overall
> global count is accurate. This was reported on X86-32 with !SMP because
> !SMP allows the negative counters to be visible. The fact that it is
> difficult to reproduce on X86-64 is probably just a co-incidence as
I guess it's related to zone sizes.
X86-64 has small DMA and large DMA32 zones for fallback of NORMAL while
x86 has just a small DMA(16M) zone.
I think DMA zone in x86 is easily full of non-LRU or non-movable pages.
So isolate_migratepagse continues to scan for finding pages which are migratable
and then it reaches near end of zone.
> the bug should theoritically be possible there.
> Finally, you found it. Congratulations on!
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
When we are debugging this problem, we found a few of bugs and enhance points
and submitted patches. It was a very good chance to fix Linux VM.
Thanks, Mel.
--
Kind regards
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-04 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 13:13 Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-30 15:37 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 17:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 12:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 12:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 13:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 14:37 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 18:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 20:21 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 20:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 21:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 22:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 23:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 17:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 18:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-04 7:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:07 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:15 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:26 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 23:02 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-01 0:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 9:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 17:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 19:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-01 21:40 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 1:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 8:34 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 13:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 15:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 2:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 15:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-04 7:25 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:39 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:19 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-04 6:58 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2011-06-06 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 13:27 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 13:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 14:45 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-05-30 16:14 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-31 4:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-31 5:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 7:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110604065853.GA4114@barrios-laptop \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=urykhy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox