From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ury Stankevich <urykhy@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are isolated and caller is asynchronous
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:40:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110601214018.GC7306@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601191529.GY19505@random.random>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:15:29PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:58:09PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Umm, HIGHMEM4G implies a two-level pagetable layout so where are
> > things like _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING being set when THP is enabled?
>
> They should be set on the pgd, pud_offset/pgd_offset will just bypass.
> The splitting bit shouldn't be special about it, the present bit
> should work the same.
This comment is misleading at best then.
#define _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING _PAGE_BIT_UNUSED1 /* only valid on a PSE pmd */
At the PGD level, it can have PSE set obviously but it's not a
PMD. I confess I haven't checked the manual to see if it's safe to
use _PAGE_BIT_UNUSED1 like this so am taking your word for it. I
found that the bug is far harder to reproduce with 3 pagetable levels
than with 2 but that is just timing. So far it has proven impossible
on x86-64 at least within 27 hours so that has me looking at how
pagetable management between x86 and x86-64 differ.
Barriers are a big different between how 32-bit !SMP and X86-64 but
don't know yet which one is relevant or if this is even the right
direction.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 13:13 Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-30 15:37 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 17:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 12:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 12:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 13:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 14:37 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 18:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 20:21 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 20:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 21:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 22:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 23:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 17:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 18:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-04 7:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:07 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:15 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:26 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 23:02 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-01 0:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 9:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 17:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 19:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-01 21:40 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-06-01 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 1:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 8:34 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 13:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 15:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 2:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 15:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-04 7:25 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:39 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:19 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-04 6:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 13:27 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 13:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 14:45 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-05-30 16:14 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-31 4:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-31 5:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 7:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110601214018.GC7306@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=urykhy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox