From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] vmscan: make isolate_lru_page with filter aware
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:46:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110531134609.GB4594@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48bcb7597cd5695f30381715630dc66a5d32c638.1306689214.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 03:13:45AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> In __zone_reclaim case, we don't want to shrink mapped page.
> Nonetheless, we have isolated mapped page and re-add it into
> LRU's head. It's unnecessary CPU overhead and makes LRU churning.
>
> Of course, when we isolate the page, the page might be mapped but
> when we try to migrate the page, the page would be not mapped.
> So it could be migrated. But race is rare and although it happens,
> it's no big deal.
>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 9972356..39941c7 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1395,6 +1395,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long nr_taken;
> unsigned long nr_anon;
> unsigned long nr_file;
> + enum ISOLATE_PAGE_MODE mode = ISOLATE_NONE;
>
> while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(zone, file, sc))) {
> congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
> @@ -1406,13 +1407,20 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
>
> set_reclaim_mode(priority, sc, false);
> lru_add_drain();
> +
> + if (!sc->may_unmap)
> + mode |= ISOLATE_UNMAPPED;
> + if (!sc->may_writepage)
> + mode |= ISOLATE_CLEAN;
> + mode |= sc->reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM ?
> + ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
Hmm, it would probably be cleaner to fully convert the isolation mode
into independent flags. INACTIVE, ACTIVE, BOTH is currently a
tri-state among flags, which is a bit ugly.
mode = ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
if (!sc->may_unmap)
mode |= ISOLATE_UNMAPPED;
if (!sc->may_writepage)
mode |= ISOLATE_CLEAN;
if (sc->reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM)
mode |= ISOLATE_ACTIVE;
What do you think?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-31 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-29 18:13 [PATCH v2 00/10] Prevent LRU churning Minchan Kim
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] Make clear description of isolate/putback functions Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 20:48 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] compaction: trivial clean up acct_isolated Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 12:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 15:31 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] Change isolate mode from int type to enum type Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 13:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-31 13:44 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] Add additional isolation mode Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 13:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 15:55 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] compaction: make isolate_lru_page with filter aware Minchan Kim
2011-06-01 16:03 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] vmscan: " Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 13:46 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-05-31 13:51 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] In order putback lru core Minchan Kim
2011-06-01 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] migration: make in-order-putback aware Minchan Kim
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] compaction: make compaction use in-order putback Minchan Kim
2011-05-29 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] add tracepoints Minchan Kim
2011-05-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Prevent LRU churning Minchan Kim
2011-05-30 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-30 7:25 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110531134609.GB4594@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox