From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] data integrity: Stabilize pages during writeback for ext4
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:57:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110504235706.GJ20579@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304536162-sup-3721@think>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:21:55PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-05-04 14:46:44 -0400:
> > This seems to miss out on a lot of the generic functionality like
> > write_cache_pages and block_page_mkwrite and just patch it into
> > the ext4 copy & paste variants. Please make sure your patches also
> > work for filesystem that use more of the generic functionality like
> > xfs or ext2 (the latter one might be fun for the mmap case).
>
> Probably after the block_commit_write in block_page_mkwrite()
> Another question is, do we want to introduce a wait_on_stable_page_writeback()?
Something like this here? It fixes block_page_mkwrite users and sticks in a
simple page_mkwrite for fses that don't provide one at all. From a quick wac
run it seems to make xfs work. ext2 seems to have some issues with modifying a
buffer_head's bh_data without locking the bh during the update, so I guess it
needs some review.
--D
--
fs: Modify/provide generic writepage/page_mkwrite functions to wait for writeback
Modify the generic writepage function, and add an empty page_mkwrite function,
to wait for page writeback to finish before allowing writes. This is so that
simple filesystems have stable pages during write operations.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---
fs/buffer.c | 1 +
mm/filemap.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index a08bb8e..cf9a795 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ block_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf,
if (!ret)
ret = block_commit_write(page, 0, end);
+ wait_on_page_writeback(page);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
unlock_page(page);
if (ret == -ENOMEM)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index c22675f..9cb4e51 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1713,8 +1713,18 @@ page_not_uptodate:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fault);
+static int empty_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ struct page *page = vmf->page;
+
+ lock_page(page);
+ wait_on_page_writeback(page);
+ return VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
+}
+
const struct vm_operations_struct generic_file_vm_ops = {
.fault = filemap_fault,
+ .page_mkwrite = empty_page_mkwrite,
};
/* This is used for a general mmap of a disk file */
--
Here's the beginning of a patch against ext2 also. It fixes most of the
checksum errors when metadata writes are in progress, though I suspect there
are more spots that I haven't caught yet.
--
ext2: Lock buffer_heads during metadata update
ext2 does not protect buffer head that represent metadata against modifications
during write operations. This is a problem if the memory buffer needs to be
stable during writes; I think there are a few more spots in ext2 that need this
treatment. :)
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---
fs/ext2/inode.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index 788e09a..5314b0b 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -1426,6 +1426,7 @@ static int __ext2_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync)
if (IS_ERR(raw_inode))
return -EIO;
+ lock_buffer(bh);
/* For fields not not tracking in the in-memory inode,
* initialise them to zero for new inodes. */
if (ei->i_state & EXT2_STATE_NEW)
@@ -1502,6 +1503,8 @@ static int __ext2_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync)
}
} else for (n = 0; n < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; n++)
raw_inode->i_block[n] = ei->i_data[n];
+ unlock_buffer(bh);
+
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
if (do_sync) {
sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110321164305.GC7153@quack.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <20110406232938.GF1110@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20110407165700.GB7363@quack.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <20110408203135.GH1110@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20110411124229.47bc28f6@corrin.poochiereds.net>
[not found] ` <1302543595-sup-4352@think>
[not found] ` <1302569212.2580.13.camel@mingming-laptop>
[not found] ` <20110412005719.GA23077@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <1302742128.2586.274.camel@mingming-laptop>
[not found] ` <20110422000226.GA22189@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
2011-05-04 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-05-04 18:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-04 19:21 ` Chris Mason
2011-05-04 20:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-05-04 23:57 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2011-05-05 15:26 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: Clean up some wait_on_page_writeback calls Darrick J. Wong
2011-05-04 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ext4: Wait for writeback to complete while making pages writable Darrick J. Wong
2011-05-04 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: Wait for writeback when grabbing pages to begin a write Darrick J. Wong
2011-05-04 18:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110504235706.GJ20579@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox