From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1269000C1 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991BC3EE0B5 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:41:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8043245DEA5 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:41:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6718545DEA0 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:41:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1591DB803E for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:41:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.146]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275311DB8038 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:41:00 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:34:22 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg background reclaim , yet another one. Message-Id: <20110427093422.7740aa21.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20110425182529.c7c37bb4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110425191437.d881ee68.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110426103859.05eb7a35.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110426164341.fb6c80a4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110426174754.07a58f22.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ying Han Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Johannes Weiner , "minchan.kim@gmail.com" , Michal Hocko , Greg Thelen , Hugh Dickins On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:08:38 -0700 Ying Han wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:47 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki < > kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > BTW, I think it's better to avoid the watermark reclaim work as kswapd. > > It's confusing because we've talked about global reclaim at LSF. > > > > Can you clarify that? > Maybe I should write "it's better to avoid calling watermark work as kswapd" Many guys talk about soft-limit and removing LRU at talking about kswapd or bacground reclaim ;) Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org