From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:17:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110426121751.GB5114@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110424031531.GA11220@localhost>
On Sun 24-04-11 11:15:31, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > One of the many requirements for writeback is that if userspace is
> > continually dirtying pages in a particular file, that shouldn't cause
> > the kupdate function to concentrate on that file's newly-dirtied pages,
> > neglecting pages from other files which were less-recently dirtied.
> > (and dirty nodes, etc).
>
> Sadly I do find the old pages that the flusher never get a chance to
> catch and write them out.
What kind of load do you use?
> In the below case, if the task dirties pages fast enough at the end of
> file, writeback_index will never get a chance to wrap back. There may
> be various variations of this case.
>
> file head
> [ *** ==>***************]==>
> old pages writeback_index fresh dirties
>
> Ironically the current kernel relies on pageout() to catch these
> old pages, which is not only inefficient, but also not reliable.
> If a full LRU walk takes an hour, the old pages may stay dirtied
> for an hour.
Well, the kupdate behavior has always been just a best-effort thing. We
always tried to handle well common cases but didn't try to solve all of
them. Unless we want to track dirty-age of every page (which we don't
want because it's too expensive), there is really no way to make syncing
of old pages 100% working for all the cases unless we do data-integrity
type of writeback for the whole inode - but that could create new problems
with stalling other files for too long I suspect.
> We may have to do (conditional) tagged ->writepages to safeguard users
> from losing data he'd expect to be written hours ago.
Well, if the file is continuously written (and in your case it must be
even continuosly grown) I'd be content if we handle well the common case of
linear append (that happens for log files etc.). If we can do well for more
cases, even better but I'd be cautious not to disrupt some other more
common cases.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 8:03 [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works v2 Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] writeback: pass writeback_control down to move_expired_inodes() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-04 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04 11:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-04 11:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04 11:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-04 11:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-21 1:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-21 1:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-24 3:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26 12:17 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-04-26 13:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26 13:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26 14:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-27 11:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-20 8:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04 7:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 16:37 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-05 16:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 5:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 8:42 ` [RFC][PATCH] writeback: limit number of moved inodes in queue_io() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 10:06 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-06 14:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Jan Kara
2011-05-10 4:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 4:53 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110426121751.GB5114@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox