From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
"minchan.kim@gmail.com" <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: add high/low watermark to res_counter
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:28:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425182849.ab708f12.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110425182529.c7c37bb4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
There are two watermarks added per-memcg including "high_wmark" and "low_wmark".
The per-memcg kswapd is invoked when the memcg's memory usage(usage_in_bytes)
is higher than the low_wmark. Then the kswapd thread starts to reclaim pages
until the usage is lower than the high_wmark.
Each watermark is calculated based on the hard_limit(limit_in_bytes) for each
memcg. Each time the hard_limit is changed, the corresponding wmarks are
re-calculated. Since memory controller charges only user pages, there is
no need for a "min_wmark". The current calculation of wmarks is based on
individual tunable high_wmark_distance, which are set to 0 by default.
low_wmark is calculated in automatic way.
Changelog:v8b...v7
1. set low_wmark_distance in automatic using fixed HILOW_DISTANCE.
Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1
include/linux/res_counter.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/res_counter.c | 6 +++
mm/memcontrol.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
Index: memcg/include/linux/memcontrol.h
===================================================================
--- memcg.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ memcg/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struc
extern struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page);
extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p);
+extern int mem_cgroup_watermark_ok(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int charge_flags);
static inline
int mm_match_cgroup(const struct mm_struct *mm, const struct mem_cgroup *cgroup)
Index: memcg/include/linux/res_counter.h
===================================================================
--- memcg.orig/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ memcg/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ struct res_counter {
*/
unsigned long long soft_limit;
/*
+ * the limit that reclaim triggers.
+ */
+ unsigned long long low_wmark_limit;
+ /*
+ * the limit that reclaim stops.
+ */
+ unsigned long long high_wmark_limit;
+ /*
* the number of unsuccessful attempts to consume the resource
*/
unsigned long long failcnt;
@@ -55,6 +63,9 @@ struct res_counter {
#define RESOURCE_MAX (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX
+#define CHARGE_WMARK_LOW 0x01
+#define CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH 0x02
+
/**
* Helpers to interact with userspace
* res_counter_read_u64() - returns the value of the specified member.
@@ -92,6 +103,8 @@ enum {
RES_LIMIT,
RES_FAILCNT,
RES_SOFT_LIMIT,
+ RES_LOW_WMARK_LIMIT,
+ RES_HIGH_WMARK_LIMIT
};
/*
@@ -147,6 +160,24 @@ static inline unsigned long long res_cou
return margin;
}
+static inline bool
+res_counter_under_high_wmark_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
+{
+ if (cnt->usage < cnt->high_wmark_limit)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline bool
+res_counter_under_low_wmark_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
+{
+ if (cnt->usage < cnt->low_wmark_limit)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* Get the difference between the usage and the soft limit
* @cnt: The counter
@@ -169,6 +200,30 @@ res_counter_soft_limit_excess(struct res
return excess;
}
+static inline bool
+res_counter_under_low_wmark_limit(struct res_counter *cnt)
+{
+ bool ret;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ ret = res_counter_under_low_wmark_limit_check_locked(cnt);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline bool
+res_counter_under_high_wmark_limit(struct res_counter *cnt)
+{
+ bool ret;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ ret = res_counter_under_high_wmark_limit_check_locked(cnt);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static inline void res_counter_reset_max(struct res_counter *cnt)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -214,4 +269,27 @@ res_counter_set_soft_limit(struct res_co
return 0;
}
+static inline int
+res_counter_set_high_wmark_limit(struct res_counter *cnt,
+ unsigned long long wmark_limit)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ cnt->high_wmark_limit = wmark_limit;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int
+res_counter_set_low_wmark_limit(struct res_counter *cnt,
+ unsigned long long wmark_limit)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ cnt->low_wmark_limit = wmark_limit;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags);
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
Index: memcg/kernel/res_counter.c
===================================================================
--- memcg.orig/kernel/res_counter.c
+++ memcg/kernel/res_counter.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter
spin_lock_init(&counter->lock);
counter->limit = RESOURCE_MAX;
counter->soft_limit = RESOURCE_MAX;
+ counter->low_wmark_limit = RESOURCE_MAX;
+ counter->high_wmark_limit = RESOURCE_MAX;
counter->parent = parent;
}
@@ -103,6 +105,10 @@ res_counter_member(struct res_counter *c
return &counter->failcnt;
case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
return &counter->soft_limit;
+ case RES_LOW_WMARK_LIMIT:
+ return &counter->low_wmark_limit;
+ case RES_HIGH_WMARK_LIMIT:
+ return &counter->high_wmark_limit;
};
BUG();
Index: memcg/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- memcg.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ memcg/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -278,6 +278,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
*/
struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
+
+ /*
+ * used to calculate the low/high_wmarks based on the limit_in_bytes.
+ */
+ u64 high_wmark_distance;
};
/* Stuffs for move charges at task migration. */
@@ -867,6 +872,44 @@ out:
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_cgroup_count_vm_event);
/*
+ * If Hi-Low distance is too big, background reclaim tend to be cpu hogging.
+ * If Hi-Low distance is too small, small memory usage spike (by temporal
+ * shell scripts) causes background reclaim and make thing worse. But memory
+ * spike can be avoided by setting high-wmark a bit higier. We use fixed size
+ * size of HiLow Distance, this will be easy to use.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT /* object size tend do be twice */
+#define HILOW_DISTANCE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
+#else
+#define HILOW_DISTANCE (2 * 1024 * 1024)
+#endif
+
+static void setup_per_memcg_wmarks(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+ u64 limit;
+
+ limit = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->res, RES_LIMIT);
+ if (mem->high_wmark_distance == 0) {
+ res_counter_set_low_wmark_limit(&mem->res, limit);
+ res_counter_set_high_wmark_limit(&mem->res, limit);
+ } else {
+ u64 low_wmark, high_wmark, low_distance;
+ if (mem->high_wmark_distance <= HILOW_DISTANCE)
+ low_distance = mem->high_wmark_distance / 2;
+ else
+ low_distance = HILOW_DISTANCE;
+ if (low_distance < PAGE_SIZE * 2)
+ low_distance = PAGE_SIZE * 2;
+
+ low_wmark = limit - low_distance;
+ high_wmark = limit - mem->high_wmark_distance;
+
+ res_counter_set_low_wmark_limit(&mem->res, low_wmark);
+ res_counter_set_high_wmark_limit(&mem->res, high_wmark);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
* Following LRU functions are allowed to be used without PCG_LOCK.
* Operations are called by routine of global LRU independently from memcg.
* What we have to take care of here is validness of pc->mem_cgroup.
@@ -3264,6 +3307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struc
else
memcg->memsw_is_minimum = false;
}
+ setup_per_memcg_wmarks(memcg);
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
if (!ret)
@@ -3324,6 +3368,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit
else
memcg->memsw_is_minimum = false;
}
+ setup_per_memcg_wmarks(memcg);
mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
if (!ret)
@@ -4603,6 +4648,30 @@ static void __init enable_swap_cgroup(vo
}
#endif
+/*
+ * We use low_wmark and high_wmark for triggering per-memcg kswapd.
+ * The reclaim is triggered by low_wmark (usage > low_wmark) and stopped
+ * by high_wmark (usage < high_wmark).
+ */
+int mem_cgroup_watermark_ok(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+ int charge_flags)
+{
+ long ret = 0;
+ int flags = CHARGE_WMARK_LOW | CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH;
+
+ if (!mem->high_wmark_distance)
+ return 1;
+
+ VM_BUG_ON((charge_flags & flags) == flags);
+
+ if (charge_flags & CHARGE_WMARK_LOW)
+ ret = res_counter_under_low_wmark_limit(&mem->res);
+ if (charge_flags & CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH)
+ ret = res_counter_under_high_wmark_limit(&mem->res);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init(void)
{
struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *rtpn;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-25 9:25 [PATCH 0/7] memcg background reclaim , yet another one KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 9:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2011-04-26 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/7] memcg: add high/low watermark to res_counter Ying Han
2011-04-29 13:33 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-01 6:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-03 6:49 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-03 7:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-03 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-03 17:01 ` Ying Han
2011-05-04 8:58 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-04 17:16 ` Ying Han
2011-05-05 6:59 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-06 5:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-06 14:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-09 0:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-09 5:47 ` Ying Han
2011-05-09 9:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-09 9:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-10 4:43 ` Ying Han
2011-05-09 5:40 ` Ying Han
2011-05-09 7:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-09 10:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-09 12:49 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-09 23:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-10 4:39 ` Ying Han
2011-05-10 4:51 ` Ying Han
2011-05-10 6:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-10 7:09 ` Ying Han
2011-05-04 3:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-04 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-09 3:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 9:07 ` Balbir Singh
2011-05-06 5:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 9:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] memcg high watermark interface KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 22:36 ` Ying Han
2011-04-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: select victim node in round robin KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 9:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg fix scan ratio with small memcg KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 17:35 ` Ying Han
2011-04-26 1:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 9:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] memcg bgreclaim core KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 4:59 ` Ying Han
2011-04-26 5:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 23:15 ` Ying Han
2011-04-27 0:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-27 1:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 18:37 ` Ying Han
2011-04-25 9:40 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg add zone_all_unreclaimable KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 9:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg watermark reclaim workqueue KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 23:19 ` Ying Han
2011-04-27 0:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-27 3:40 ` Ying Han
2011-04-25 9:43 ` [PATCH 8/7] memcg : reclaim statistics KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 5:35 ` Ying Han
2011-04-25 9:49 ` [PATCH 0/7] memcg background reclaim , yet another one KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 10:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 22:21 ` Ying Han
2011-04-26 1:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 7:19 ` Ying Han
2011-04-26 7:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 8:43 ` Ying Han
2011-04-26 8:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-26 23:08 ` Ying Han
2011-04-27 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-27 1:19 ` Ying Han
2011-04-28 3:55 ` Ying Han
2011-04-28 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-02 7:02 ` Balbir Singh
2011-05-02 6:09 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425182849.ab708f12.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox