From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4227A8D003B
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:25:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.74])
	by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B423EE0C2
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from smail (m4 [127.0.0.1])
	by outgoing.m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8202E68E4
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.94])
	by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3451EF084
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D19E78007
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.133])
	by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369DAE78002
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:26 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pass the scan_control into shrinkers
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimWMr9Fp=cFF3q2Q5_pyrUVnFsS2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110420095429.45FD.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <BANLkTimWMr9Fp=cFF3q2Q5_pyrUVnFsS2w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20110420102523.4608.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:25:24 +0900 (JST)
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org

> For now, I added the "nr_slab_to_reclaim" and also consolidate the
> gfp_mask. More importantly this makes any further change (pass stuff from
> reclaim to the shrinkers) easier w/o modifying each file of the shrinker.
> 
> So make it into a new struct sounds reasonable to me. How about something
> called "slab_control".

Both looks ok to me.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>